Template talk:Translation license

Latest comment: 11 years ago by Prosody in topic Broken?

Documentation edit

Usage edit

{{translation license
 |original    = {{PD-old}}
 |translation = {{PD-US}}
}}

   This work is a translation and has a separate copyright status to the applicable copyright protections of the original content.

Original:

 

This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse

Translation:

 

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.


This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.

 

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse

Broken? edit

At some point it seems that the license templates in the main namespace have been made to appear at the very bottom of the page. As a result they no longer appear next to the Original: and Translation: labels. See for example Manifesto of the Communist Party. Prosody (talk) 14:55, 6 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Check again - just tweaked it, though it appeared just like it always did for me before that. So did your link.
The existing table was placed in a div container so it could be forced out of the content field a couple of weeks ago. I don't see how that would have affected to what amounts the cell relation in a single row. -- George Orwell III (talk) 15:18, 6 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
I just tried it with Chrome 18, Firefox 12, and Internet Explorer 9 on Windows 7, with varying window sizes from 1928x1080 to 640x480. On each the license templates appear below the translation license table. Prosody (talk) 16:08, 6 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
I get it now. Being a nested table within a table approach here, my stand-alone license div container winds up being present at least twice if not three times when ultimately transcluded to the mainspace. I killed the container for stand-alone license templates, which sucks imo, but if folks can live with I guess I can too
this template "should" behave independent of Dynamic Layout though. Let me know either way while I ponder why I didn't see any differences here. -- George Orwell III (talk) 17:07, 6 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
Works as expected. Much obliged! Prosody (talk) 17:29, 6 May 2012 (UTC)Reply