Oyama v. California

Oyama v. California (1948)
the Supreme Court of the United States

Syllabus

Opinion of the Court

→

Oyama v. State of California, 332 U.S. 633 (1948), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court decided that specific provisions of the 1913 and 1920 California Alien Land Laws abridged the rights and privileges guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment to Fred Oyama, a citizen of the United States in whose name his father, who held Japanese citizenship, had purchased land. In doing so, however, the court did not overturn the California Alien Land Laws as unconstitutional. Warning: template has been deprecated.

901985Oyama v. California — Syllabusthe Supreme Court of the United States

Court Documents

Opinion of the Court

Concurring Opinions: Black; Murphy

Dissenting Opinions: Reed; Jackson

Wikipedia article

United States Supreme Court

Oyama v. California

Argued: Oct. 22, 1947. --- Decided: Jan 19, 1948

Messrs. A. L. Wirin, of Los Angeles, Cal., and Dean G. Acheson, of Washington, D.C., for petitioners.

Messrs. Everett W. Mattoon, of Los Angeles, Cal., and Duane J. Carnes, of San Diego, Cal., for respondents.

[Argument of Counsel from page 634 intentionally omitted]

Mr. Chief Justice VINSON delivered the opinion of the Court.

Notes edit

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse

Retrieved from "https://en.wikisource.org/w/index.php?title=Oyama_v._California&oldid=13890235"