Page:A History of Banking in the United States.djvu/369

This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
COURSE OF THE CRISIS; 1840-41.
347

of the refusal to pay specie, but the plaintiff did not keep the notes during the three months limit, which was provided for between the first demand and the second demand. Hence he lost the fight to maintain the suit.[1]

"In 1841 [at New York] the necessity of again suspending was freely discussed, but such a course was strongly opposed by the larger banks. These sold their claims on Philadelphia at as high a rate of discount as thirteen per cent. Mr. Newbold, of the Bank of America, brought at one time from Philadelphia $400,000 in specie, which enabled the banks of that city to maintain specie payments."[2]

The Wilmington banks suspended upon the news from Philadelphia. The Legislature of Delaware suspended the twelve per cent. penalty.[3] The Baltimore banks failed again, February 8th, after losing $100,000 specie. March 15th, the Georgia Railroad Bank failed, after paying out $200,000.[4] On the following day the North Carolina banks failed. Those of Virginia held out until April 6th, suffering heavy runs.[5] As for the banks further south and west, it is difficult to say whether and when they resumed, and when they suspended again.[6]

The capital of all the banks in the United States which failed in 1841 was nearly $70 millions, with a circulation of $24 millions. The total circulation was reduced below the point at which it stood in 1834.[7]

Inasmuch as the relief notes were receivable at the banks, they floated at bank par during 1841. In June, it was reported that money at Philadelphia was at eight and ten per cent. per annum; the small notes were not yet out. Five Philadelphia banks had refused the relief bill and would not accept the relief notes.[8]

Three counterfeit detectors were published at Philadelphia at this time. In an issue of one of them, in July, were described 1,727 counterfeits on bank notes; the greatest number on any one denomination was on the five's,—namely, 588. The counterfeits on the Bank of the United States were not included. "They were so various that one specimen from each would have sufficed to paper one side of a room."[9]

The whigs, having won the election of 1840, were most impatient to undo everything which had been done during the last twelve years, and President Harrison immediately called an extra session of Congress to meet May 31st. Upon his death, the question at once arose: What are John Tyler's opinions and wishes? His message at the opening of the extra session disappointed the whigs. It did not respond at all to the temper of eager purpose in which they were. Clay and Tyler came into collision at once, the one being the actual chief of the party, the other its official representative. With the political aspects of the period we are not here concerned, except so far as they affected the measures which were applied in respect to banking institutions; but it must be noted that on that matter

  1. 2 Ashmead, 406.
  2. Domett. Bank of New York, 87.
  3. 59 Niles, 372; 60 ditto, 22.
  4. 60 Niles, 48.
  5. Ibid, 96.
  6. See Chapter 15, on the Liquidation.
  7. Elliot's Funding, 1176
  8. 60 Niles, 187, 272.
  9. Gouge; Journal of Banking, 26.