Page:A History of Hindu Chemistry Vol 1.djvu/49

This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.

xxxi

time the Charaka and the Susruta were regarded as hoary with the prescription of age, and their memories had passed into the region of tradition.[1]

The Commentators of Susruta.The earliest commentary of the Susruta that has been partially preserved to us is known as the Bhánumati by Chakrapáni Datta, the celebrated author of the medical work which goes by his name (about 1060 A. D). The other well-known commentary, the Nibandha Samgraha, is by Dalvana, who lived in the reign of Sahanapála Deva whose kingdom was situated somewhere near Muttra. Dalvana acknowledges his obligations to the previous commentators, namely Jejjata, Gayadása, Bháskara, and Mádhava whose dates it is not easy to ascertain.

The purity of the text.Since a remote period the text of the Susruta has been jealously preserved and no tampering with it tolerated. Thus Dalvana refuses to
  1. On the age of Vágbhata see below under its proper heading.