Page:A history of the theories of aether and electricity. Whittacker E.T. (1910).pdf/140

This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
120
The Luminiferous Medium,

and therefore (neglecting second-order terms in w/c)

.

Denoting by δ the value of δ1, when w is zero, we have

.

Subtracting this equation from the preceding, we have

.

Now the telescope by which the emergent wave-front B1D is received is itself being carried forward by the earth's motion; and we must therefore apply the usual correction for aberration in order to find the apparent direction of the emergent ray. But this correction is w sin δ/c, and precisely counteracts the effect which has been calculated as due to the motion of the prison. So finally we see that the motion of the earth has no first-order influence on the refraction of light from the stars.

Fresnel inferred from his formula that if observations were made with a telescope filled with water, the aberration would be unaffected by the presence of the water—a result which was verified by Airy[1] in 1871. He showed, moreover, that the apparent positions of terrestrial objects, carried along with the observer, are not displaced by the earth's motion; that experiments in refraction and interference are not influenced by any motion which is common to the source, apparatus, and observer; and that light travels between given points of a moving material system by the path of least time. These predictions have also been confirmed by observation: Respighi[2] in 1861, and Hoek[3] in 1868, experimenting with a telescope filled with water and a terrestrial source of light, found that no effect was produced on the phenomena of reflexion and refraction by altering the orienta-

  1. Proc. Roy. Soc., xx, p. 35.
  2. Mem. Accad. Sci. Bologna, 71, p. 279.
  3. Ast. Nach, lxxiii, p. 193.