his theory was furnished by experiment. That an electric field is closely concerned with the propagation of light was demonstrated in 1875, when John Kerr[1] showed that dielectrics subjected to powerful electrostatic force acquire the property of double refraction, their optical behaviour being similar to that of uniaxal crystals whose axes are directed along the lines of force.
Other researches undertaken at this time had a more direct bearing on the questions at issue between the hypothesis of Maxwell and the older potential theories. In 1875-6 Helmholtz[2] and his pupil Schiller[3] attempted to discriminate between the various doctrines and formulae relative to unclosed circuits by performing a crucial experiment.
It was agreed in all theories that a ring-shaped magnet, which returns into itself so as to have no poles, can exert no ponderomotive force on other magnets or on closed electric currents. Helmholtz[4] had, however, shown in 1873 that according to the potential-theories such a magnet would exert a ponderomotive force on an unclosed current. The matter was tested by suspending a magnetized steel ring by a long fibre in a closed metallic case, near which was placed a terminal of a Holtz machine. No ponderomotive force could be observed when the machine was put in action so as to produce a brush discharge from the terminal: from which it was inferred that the potential-theories do not correctly represent the phenomena, at least when displacement-currents and convection-currents (such as that of the electricity carried by the electrically repelled air from the terminal) are not taken into account.
The researches of Helmholtz and Schiller brought into prominence the question as to the effects produced by the
- ↑ Phil. Mag. (4) 1 (1875), pp. 337, 446; (5) viii (1879), pp. 85, 229; xiii (1882), pp. 153, 248.
- ↑ Monatsberichte d. Acad. d. Berlin, 1875, p. 400. Ann. d. Phys., clviii (1876), p. 87.
- ↑ Ann. d. Phys. clix (1876), pp. 456, 537; clx (1877), p. 333.
- ↑ The valuable memoirs by Helmholtz in Journal für Math. lxxii (1870), p. 57; lxxv (1873), p. 35; lxxviii (1874), p. 273, to which reference has already been made, contain a full discussion of the various possibilities of the potential-theories.
