Average Number of Persons Employed to Spindles.
| France, | one person to | 14 spindles |
| Russia, | one person to„ | 28spindles„ |
| Prussia, | one person to„ | 37spindles„ |
| Bavaria, | one person to„ | 46spindles„ |
| Austria, | one person to„ | 49spindles„ |
| Belgium, | one person to„ | 50spindles„ |
| Saxony, | one person to„ | 50spindles„ |
| Switzerland | one person to„ | 55spindles„ |
| Smaller States of Germany | one person to„ | 55spindles„ |
| Great Britain | one person to„ | 74spindles„ |
“This comparison,” says Mr. Redgrave, “is yet more unfavourable to Great Britain, inasmuch as there is so large a number of factories in which weaving by power is carried on in conjunction with spinning [whilst in the table the weavers are not deducted], and the factories abroad are chiefly spinning factories; if it were possible to compare like with like, strictly, I could find many cotton spinning factories in my district in which mules containing 2,200 spindles are minded by one man (the “minder”) and two assistants only, turning off daily 220 lbs. of yarn, measuring 400 miles in length.” (Reports of Insp. of Fact., 31st Oct., 1866, p. 31-33, passim.)
It is well known that in Eastern Europe as well as in Asia, English companies have undertaken the construction of railways, and have, in making them, employed side by side with the native labourers, a certain number of English workingmen. Compelled by practical necessity, they thus have had to take into account the national difference in the intensity of labour, but this has brought them no loss. Their experience shows that even if the height of wages corresponds more or less with the average intensity of labour, the relative price of labour varies generally in the inverse direction.[1]
- ↑ “Essay on the Rate of Wages, with an Examination of the Causes of the Differences in the Conditions of the Labouring Population throughout the World,” Henry Charles Carey, Philadelphia, 1835.
