Page:England & Russia in Central Asia,Vol-I.djvu/87

This page needs to be proofread.
67
ENGLAND AND RUSSIA IN CENTRAL ASIA. THE AMOU DARYA.
67

THE EUSSIAN GOVERNMENT IN TURKESTAN. 67 necessary. That citj, strategically speaking, might be considered to be untenable so long as Samarcand was in hostile hands and Khokand occupied a flank position of great vantage. To render it as secure as a capital should be, and to dissipate the last vestige of resistance on the part of the Usbegs and the Kipchaks, those wars were undertaken which secured Samar- cand as a possession for the Czar, and which ultimately laid Khokand at his feet. With Tashkent as the centre of a new power thrust into the heart of Turkestan, there was nothing strange or unexpected in those events; but had the report of the Steppe Commission been disregarded, and Tashkent remained only an advanced post of the Russian Empire, and not a new capital, it is very probable that the progress of Russian arms in a southerly direction would have been less precipitate, and less full of menace to India. The Steppe Commission also was not content with the formation of a new government in Turkestan whose destiny would lie in the hands of a magnate only im- perfectly under the control of the Imperial authorities. It was necessary to add to its dimensions before these had been rendered formidable by successful conquest ; and with that object an immense tract of country was severed from the governorship of Semipalatinsk, and included in the new administration of Turkestan. This region was known as Semiretchinsk,* and may be roughly defined as all that country lying between Semipalatinsk and the Irtish on the one hand, and the

  • Semiretchinsk means " the coimtry of the seven rivers."

5 *