a hybrid between a goat and a cow, and other similar ones,
and he is angry with Koelreuter for fixing such narrow limits
to the occurrence of hybrids; thus the first person who
produced hybrids systematically in the vegetable kingdom
must submit to be scolded for refusing to accept the imaginary
hybrids of his contemporaries. Gleichen's book and the selection from his microscopic discoveries, which appeared in
1777, abound in good detached observations; he was the first
who saw and figured the pollen-tubes of Asclepias, without of
course suspecting their real nature and importance.
Kaspar Friedrich Wolff is usually said to be the writer who refuted the theory of evolution. It is certainly true that in his dissertation for his doctor's degree in 1759, the well-known 'Theoria generationis,' he appeared as the decided opponent of evolution; but the weight of his arguments was not great, and the hybridisation in plants which was discovered at about the same time by Koelreuter supplied much more convincing proof against every form of evolution. Wolff conceived of the act of fertilisation as simply another form of nutrition. Relying on the observation, which is only partly true, that starved plants are the first to bloom, he regarded the formation of flowers generally as the expression of feeble nutrition (vegetatio languescens). On the other hand the formation of fruit in the flower was due to the fact, that the pistil found more perfect nourishment in the pollen. In this Wolff was going back to an idea which had received some support from Aristotle, and is the most barren that can be imagined, for it appears to be utterly incapable of giving any explanation of the phenomena connected with sexuality, and especially of accounting for the results of hybridisation. Wolff may have rejected the theory of evolution on such grounds as these, but he failed to perceive what it is which is essential and peculiar in the sexual act.
