?36 SURVEY OF THe, 11?IT?R?'BOPlCAL under im 1? ?n ?n f?oms mud, ? ?r? or ?ur hundred y?s off its .?g?. The next ?ng w? so ?ick ?d able? ?at we delaye d get? under ?gh a?r eight o'd?, wh?, wi?o?t its we? m?e ?prov? ap??, westee? ?e no? west towns the m? ?d. At ?u o'?k, ?sed betw? Pier's I?, ?d ?en no? p?sed at about ?ree-qu?ers of a to the e?tw?d of a sm? r?ky sh?, on were two ? ?ees. ?s p?c? is as it may be ?teresti? at s?e fut? t?e watch the pro?s of ?s islet, w? is now ? i?t s?; it was n? on the Yo? I?d. A Mgh lump in ?e N.N.E. w? ? ge?n's Isl?d; and ? ?e uo?w? is a group ? isl? ? Cape Gr?e, w? n? in ?mp?ent W Sir Ever? Home? B?. In st?r?g round ?e ?up? we c?e u? Capt? C?k's. tra&, but le? it ?dn hy ?e away ? ?e w?twad ?w?& a ?y on ?e no? side of Cape Grenv?e. U?n r?nt withi? Sunday Is?d, so n? by CapOn so?di?s were struck in seven fathoms, but �r? h?ves ?ey d?eas? ? two fa?oms h? s?d, ?o?h our ?st? from ?c shore w?
�
