This page has been validated.
94

krïn̥ʹαχtə, ‘wheat’, O.Ir. cruith­necht; kʹɔ꞉ ·brin̥ʹə, ‘haze portend­ing heat’, cp. Di. ceobhrán; Lʹin̥ʹə, compar. of Lʹαhən, ‘broad’; ræn̥ʹαχ, rαin̥ʹαχ, ‘fern’, M.Ir. raithnech. (c) < chn, e.g. ïn̥ʹu꞉r, ‘set of ten’, Di. deich­neabhar, O.Ir. dechenbor; in̥ʹi꞉Nʹ, ‘brain’, M.Ir. inchind.

Note on the r sounds.

§ 265. Corresponding to the four l and four n sounds described above we expect to find four parallel r sounds (R, r, , r), but it would seem that almost every­where r has been general­ised for R and there are no remains what­so­ever of . If any traces of had survived we might expect to find them in such sandhi combi­nations as Nʹi꞉rʹ rʹïgər se, ‘he did not answer’; fʹαrəg ə Nʹirʹ rʹiʃNʹæʃi꞉ (fʹrʹiʃNʹæʃαχ), ‘the temper of the irritable man’. I have tried all imagin­able combi­nations but have never heard anything but . It is easy to form a palatal r with the articu­lation of , , i.e. with the front rim of the tongue pressing against the lower teeth, but I cannot conceive why the sound was given up. Of R on the other hand there are distinct traces, but not in the initial position where it has become r. Fortunate­ly Donegal has not leng­thened the vowel in every case before R as Munster and Connaught have done and it is at the end of mono­syllables after a short vowel that we must look for the sound.

9. R.

§ 266. By this symbol we denote a long, strongly trilled r with the tongue vibrating against the alveoles just above the upper teeth. Whether in pro­nouncing R the point of the tongue original­ly acted against the teeth as in the case of L, N, it is now impos­sible to say. O’Brien in his Grammar says (p. 11)꞉ “It (viz. r) is sometimes written double, as barrach tow; earr, champion; and is then strongly pro­nounced, with a longer dwelling on the sound of r than if it were written singly”. Now O’Brien was according to O’Donovan a native of Meath and it is quite likely that traces of R were preserved in that district as they have been in the west of Ulster. Quite un­necessari­ly Pedersen remarks (p. 38) that it is in­conceiv­able that rr in barrach should be long. For traces of R in Scotland see Henderson, ZCP. iv 523.