Railroad Company T. State of Illinois, 177 it. 514; The Irrawaddy, 171 it. 192; Ralli t>. Troup, 157 il>. 386; Knapp Company v. McCaffrey, 177 it. 638; Potts z1. Creager, 155 it. 597; City of Walla Walla v. Water Company, 172 ib. I; Handley v. Stutz, 139 ib. 417; Austin v. State of Tennessee, 179 ^.343: Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company v. State of Kentucky, 161 ib. 677; Pearsell v. Great Northern Railway Com-
farte Thompson, i Flippin 507; The Scotia, 35 Federal Reporter, 907; The Manitoba, 2 Flippin, 241; Castro v De Uriarte, 12 it. 250; Burton?•. Stratton, it. 696; The Trenton, 4 ib. 657; The Two Marys, 10 ib. 919; The Dolphin, i Flippin 580; Gibson v. Cincinnati Inquirer, 2 Federal Reporter 121: The Worthington, 19115.836 Pequignot r. Detroit, 16 it. 211; Heye :>. North Ger man I.loyd 33 it. 60; The James P. Donaldson, 19 it.
MR. JUSTICE WHITF.
pany, 161 it. 646; The Maine r. Williams, 152 it. 122; Constable v. National Steamship Company, 154 ib. 51 : The Corsair, 145 ib. 335; Ridson Locomotive Works T. Ridart, 158 /*. 68; Holmes?'. Hurst, 174 ib. 85; Holder). v. Handy, 169 it. 366; Pollock v. Farmers Loan and Trust Company, 158 it. 60 r; Tucker r. Alexandioff, 183 it. 424. In the United States Circuit and District Courts : United States r. Clark, 31 Federal Reporter 710; ex
264; The Alberta, 23 it. 807 : Phillipps v. Detroit, 4 Manning and Arden, 347; Ex farte Byers. 32 Federal Reporter 404; Hrush Electric Company 43 it. 533; Saginaw lias Light Company, • Saginaw, 28 it. 529; Navigat on Company i>. Insurance Company, 26 it. 596. MR. JUSTICE SHIRAS : New England Railroad Company r. Conroy, 175 U. S. 323; Brown?'. Walker, 161 if<. 541; Lake Shore and Michigan Southern Railroad Company
