Page:Tickle v Giggle for Girls Pty Ltd (No 2).pdf/8

PART 1: INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS		[1]
PART 2: OVERVIEW OF THE CASE		[13]
(a) Leave to the Sex Discrimination Commissioner to appear amicus curiae		[13]
(b) Overview of the evidence		[16]
(c) Key provisions of the SDA		[31]
(d) Pleadings		[41]
PART 3: INTERPREATION OF KEY PROVISIONS OF THE SDA		[65]
(a) History of amendments to the SDA		[65]
(b) Construction of gender identity and s 5B		[74]
(c) The special measures exception to discrimination		[81]
PART 4: EVIDENCE AND FACTUAL CONCLUSIONS		[87]
(a) Ms Tickle		[87]
(b) Ms Grover		[90]
(c) Giggle and the Giggle App		[95]
(d) The removal of Ms Tickle from the Giggle App		[108]
(i) Background		[108]
(ii) Ms Tickle's account creation and removal		[110]
(ii) Conclusions on gender identity discrimination		[129]
(e) Other evidence relied upon by the respondents		[137]
(i) Expert evidence		[138]
(ii) Lay evidence		[148]
PART 5: EVIDENCE AND FACTUAL CONCLUSIONS		[149]
(a) Is s 22 beyond the scope of Commonwealth legislative power to the extent it prohibits discrimination on the ground of gender identity?		[150]
(i) The external affairs power		[157]
CEDAW		[162]
Art 26 of the ICCPR		[181]
(ii) The trading corporations power		[189]
(b) Is s 24 of the Births, Deaths and Marriages Registration Act 2003 (Qld) (Qld BDM Registration Act) invalid by reason of inconsistency with the SDA?		[197]

---