SOVEREIGNTY. ?CO?,,,r?-r?,-rr?','? I?w, 6; Pamc't? ? Ao?, 1; ?; ?A?, 1, 6. SP?N. S? ?Tx?, 1. SPIRI? IN BOND. ? ?Ns?u?o? ?w, 5, 12; ST?E D?. ? t? ? ? ?t ?d ? ? ?e of ? ? by ? d? '? of ?w? F?eml ? w? ?ve not ? ? ? t? ?n of a F?eml ?tu?, or by t? d?o? ? ?, w? ? of such &c?ns e? the ?e v?w? ? the ? ?volv?, t? omen of ?n?, wh? sub?q?tly ?d- '? ? ?tu? ? ?Hy le? ?n?m?g that ? ? t? ? ? ? ?qu? by ?ng? ? t? j?c?] ?AT?. 1. P? W ? ? ?. T? S?, ? q?vem? ? ?p?tive of ? ? o{ t? pubHe, ? a ?d?g ? ?u? ? pm?ct the atmosphe?, the wa?r ?d ? fo? ?t? i? ?, i?s?ive of ?e ?nt or ?t o?' t? p?va? o?e? ? ?n?m?. (Ka? v. U.S. 1?; ? v. T?s? C? Co., ? U. 8. ?.) H? W?Co. v. M?, ?9. A S? ? a ?titutional ?wer ? ?sist t?t ? ?pai? by i? cit?s ?d ? not deandent u?n tor i? ? ? ? do. ? the exerci? of th? ?wer it may prohibit the �ve?on of t? wa? of its ?r?t st?s 3. P? ? ?/? ? i? ?t aff? ? F? ?. ? ? not en?t? ?y ?g?tion d?tm?ng the ?ght of a Sta? pm?de for the ?ion of ?tt]e and pmhibit?g the ?n?ng with? i? ?e? ot d? ?ttle not ? ?d p? ? ?al?hy either by t? pm?r sta? or national official. AsbsH v. Kay, 251. 4. P? ? ?h? ? ?n ? ? ?i? ? ? '? o? ? F? ?titution ?d of ? Fourth ?t
�
