Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 100 Part 5.djvu/657

This page needs to be proofread.

PUBLIC LAW 99-000—MMMM. DD, 1986

PUBLIC LAW 99-662—NOV. 17, 1986

100 STAT. 4131

MISSION ZANJA CREEK, REDLANDS, CAUFORNIA

i f

-^S-

Subject to section 903(a) of this Act, a project for flood control works along Mission Zanja Creek within the city of Redlands, California, in accordance with the plan developed by the District Engineer based on studies pursuant to section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, at a total cost of $10,400,000, with an estimated 33 USC 70ls. first Federal cost of $4,500,000 and an estimated first non-Federal cost of $5,900,000. ^

SALT AND EEL RIVERS, CAUFORNIA

Subject to section 903(a) of this Act, such measures, including silt removal and channel modification, in the vicinity of the confluence of the Salt and Eel Rivers, California, as the Secretary determines necessary to prevent recurring floods along the Eel River and its tributaries, at a total cost of $800,000, with an estimated first Federal cost of $600,000 and an estimated first non-Federal cost of $200,000. MONROE AND WEST MONROE, LOUISIANA, AND OUACHITA PARISH, LOUISIANA

Subject to section 903(a) of this Act, such structural and nonstructural measures as he deems feasible to prevent flood damage to the cities of Monroe and West Monroe, Louisiana, and Ouachita Parish, Louisiana. For purposes of analyzing the costs and benefits of any project recommended by the Secretary as a result of the study entitled Monroe-West Monroe Interim Study of the Ouachita Basin Study, Ouachita River Basin, Arkansas and Louisiana, the Secretary shall take into account the costs and benefits of measures undertaken pursuant to this subsection. NOYES, MINNESOTA

Subject to section 903(a) of this Act, the purchase of such land along Highway 75 in Minnesota as may be required for the construction of the International Levee segment of the Emerson, Manitoba flood control project and the upgrading of existing flood control levees in the vicinity of Noyes, Minnesota, at a total cost of $250,000. The Secretary is authorized to accept funds from a project cosponsor in connection with construction of such project and to include as part of the Federal share of project costs those costs which the Secretary determines are attributable to protection of Federal property, t

' J ^ f

^

(e) ADDITIONAL AUTHORIZED PROJECTS.— (1) SALYERSVILLE, KENTUCKY.—Subject

to section 903(a) of this Act, the Secretary is authorized and directed to design and construct such flood control measures at or in the vicinity of Salyersville, Kentucky, on Licking River as the Secretary determines necessary and appropriate to afford the city of Salyersville, Kentucky, and its immediate environs a level of protection against flooding at least sufficient to prevent any future losses to such city from the likelihood of flooding such as occurred in December 1978, at a total cost of $7,000,000, with an estimated first Federal cost of $5,250,000 and an estimated nonFederal cost of $1,750,000. With respect to such project. Congress finds that the benefits determined in accordance with