Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 100 Part 5.djvu/764

This page needs to be proofread.

PUBLIC LAW 99-000—MMMM. DD, 1986

100 STAT. 4238

PUBLIC LAW 99-662—NOV. 17, 1986

SEC. 1119. SUNSET HARBOR. CALIFORNIA. Reports.

Flood control.

42 USC 4332.

(a) The Secretary is directed to expedite completion of the feasibility study of the navigation project for Sunset Harbor, California, at a total cost of $900,000, and to submit a report to Congress on the results of such study not later than October 1, 1987. (b) Upon execution of agreements by the State of California or local sponsors, or both, for preservation and mitigation of wetlands areas and appropriate financial participation, the Secretary is authorized to participate with appropriate non-Federal sponsors in a project to demonstrate the feasibility of non-Federal cost sharing under the provisions of section 916 of this Act. Such project shall consist of the project for navigation, flood control, and protection of the Seal Beach Naval Weapons Station at Sunset Beach Harbor, Bolsa Chica Bay, California, at a total cost of $89,600,000, with an estimated first Federal cost of $44,800,000 and an estimated first non-Federal cost of $44,800,000, including such modifications as the Secretary may determine are advisable. The Secretary shall not undertake construction without the concurrence of the Secretary of the Navy on measures to protect the Naval Weapons Station. The Secretary shall, not later than two years after the date of enactment of this Act, make a determination of financial feasibility of the project and, to the extent possible, transmit a copy of a final feasibility study and copy of any final environmental impact statement required by section 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, and any recommendations of the Secretary, with respect to such project to the Committee on Public Works and Transportation of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public Worl^ of the Senate. Agreements for local financial participation shall include the agreements set forth in section 916 so as to meet non-Federal contributions during the period of construction as required by Federal law as administered by the Secretary, together with full amortization of the remaining Federal investment, including costs of project feasiblility studies. SEC. 1120. HILLTOP AND GRAY GOOSE IRRIGATION DISTRICTS.

South Dakota.

-r*lu:r u

(a) The existing irrigation projects known as the Hilltop Irrigation District, Brule County, South Dakota, and the Gray Goose Irrigation District, Hughes County, South Dakota, are authorized as units of the Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program. As so authorized, the Hilltop Unit and the Gray Goose Unit shall be integrated physically and financially with the other Federal works constructed under the comprehensive plan approved by section 9 of the Flood Control Act of December 22, 1944 (58 Stat. 887, 891), as amended and supplemented, and subject to Federal reclamation law (Act of June 17, 1902, 32 Stat. 388 and Acts amendatory thereof and supplemental thereto). (b) Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program power shall be made available as soon as practicable for the Hilltop Unit and the Gray Goose Unit on the same basis as for other units of the Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program. The suballocated costs of the Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program assigned to the Hilltop Unit and the Gray Goose Unit shall be reimbursed by the water users as determined by the Secretary of the Interior in accordance with Federal reclamation law (Act of June 17, 1902, 32 Stat. 388 and Acts amendatory thereof and supplemental thereto).