Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 106 Part 6.djvu/248

This page needs to be proofread.


106 STAT. 4806 PUBLIC LAW 102-580—OCT. 31, 1992 (f) OUARE SYSTEM OF THE CHICAGOLAND UNDERFLOW PLAN, ILLINOIS. —The project for flood control, O'Hare System of the Chicagoland Underflow Plan, Illinois, authorized by section 401 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4115), is modified to authorize the Secretfury to construct the project, at a total cost of $29,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $17,800,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $11,200,000. (g) ILLINOIS RIVER, ILLINOIS. —The project for inland navigation, Illinois River, Illinois, authorized by the Rivers and Heirbors Act of 1935 (49 Stat. 1035), is modified to direct the Secretary to acquire dredged materisd disposal areas for such project, at a total Federal cost of not to exceed $7,000,000. (h) SOUTH FRANKFORT, KENTUCKY.— The project forfloodprotection. South Frankfort, Kentucky, authorizea by section 102(o) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4613), is modified to provide that the cost of conducting preconstruction engineering and design for the proiect shall not be included in the computation for determining the benefit-cost ratio for the project. (i) LOCKS AND DAM 26, MISSISSIPPI RIVER, ALTON, ILLINOIS AND MISSOURI.— Section 102(1) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4613) is amended l^ inserting before the period at the end of the last sentence or other non-Federal interests". (j) LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN, LOUISIANA. —The project for hurricane-flood protection on Lake Pontchartrain, Louisiana, authorized by section 204 of the Flood Control Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 1077), is modified— (1) to direct the Secretary to construct measures to intercept and convey drainagefi:Y)mthe landside slopes of project levees in Jefferson Parish, Louisiana, directly to the existing drainage system; (2) to direct the Secretary to reevaluate the benefits of the constructed portions of the project which accrue to St. Bernard Parish and to the Lake Borgne Basin Levee District for the purposes of determining the portion of the benefits which were expected to accrue to the parish and district but which were not realized; (3) to direct the Secretary to reduce the non-Federal share of the capital costs and operation and maintenance attributable to the parish and district by the percentage of the expected benefits which were not realized; and (4) to provide that the parish and district shall not be required to make payments on their respective non-Federcd responsibilities until the Secretary has made the reductions, if any, under paragraph (3). In carrying out paragraphs (2) and (3), the Secretary shall utilize results of the study conducted under section 116(k) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 and any other relevant information. (k) PARISH CREEK, SHADY SIDE, MARYLAND.— The project for navigation. Parish Creek, Shady Side, Maryland, authorized by the nrst section of the River and Harbor Act of August 30, 1935 (49 Stat. 1031), is modified to reduce the length of the western boundanr of the turning basin by 100 feet. (1) BuFFUMViLLE LAKE, MASSACHUSETTS. — The flood control project for Buflumville Lake, Massachusetts, authorized by section