Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 106 Part 6.djvu/250

This page needs to be proofread.

106 STAT. 4808 PUBLIC LAW 102-580—OCT. 31, 1992 (9) in subparagraph (C)(vii) by inserting "integrity of the" before'Wetlands Bank"; (10) in subparagraph (C)(vii) by inserting "and any other flood control project in the Passaic River basin" after '^y this paragraph"; (11) in subparagraph (C)(viii) by striking "for the Wetlands Bank" and inserting "in accordance with clauses (ii) and (vi)"; and (12) in subparagraph (C)(viii) by inserting "and fincmcial" after "economic. (q) RARTTAN BAY AND SANDY HOOK BAY, NEW JERSEY. —The project for hurricane-flood protection, Raritan Bay and Sandy Hook Bay, New Jersey, authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1962 (76 Stat. 1181), is modified to provide periodic beach nourishment for Cliflwood Beach for 50 years. (r) SANDY HOOK TO BARNEGAT INLET, NEW JERSEY. —The project for beach erosion control, Sandy Hook to Barnegat Inlet, New Jersey, authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1958, is modified to provide that costs incurred by the non-Federal interests to stabilize the seawall at Belmar and Spring Lake, New Jersev, shall be credited, to the extent that the Secretary determines that the work of stabilizing the seawall is compatible with the project, against the non-Federal share of the cost of construction and maintenance of section 2 of the project (Asbury Park to Manasquan). (s) RIO GRANDE FLOODWAY, NEW MEXICO.— Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the project forfloodcontrol, Rio Grande Floodway, San Acacia to Bosque del Apache Unit, New Mexico, authorized by section 203 of the Flood (Jontrol Act of 1948 (Public Law 80-858) and amended by section 204 of the Flood (Control Act of 1950 (Public Law 81-516), is modified to more equitably reflect the non-Federal benefits fii^m the project in relation to the total benefits of the project by reducing the non-Federal contribution for the project by that percentage of benefits which is attributable to the Federeil properties; except that, for purposes of this subsection. Federal property benefits may not exceed 50 percent of the total project benefits. (t) JONES INLET, NEW YORK.—The project for navigation, Jones Inlet, New York, is modified to authorize and direct the Secretary to conduct a reconnaissance and feasibility study on placing noncontaminated dredged material on beach areas downdrift from the federally maintained channel at full Federal expense for purposes of mitigating environmental and other attendant damages resultingfiromthe interruption of Uttoral system natural processes caused by jetty construction and continued dredging of the Federal channel. (u) WESTHAMPTON BEACH, NEW YORK. —The project for beach erosion control and hurricane protection for Westhampton Beach, New York, authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1974, and modified b^ the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, is further modified to extend the period of beach nourishment for 30 years from the date of project completion. The non- Federal share of project costs shall not exceed 35 percent of the total project cost as provided in such Acts. (v) BROKEN Bow LAKE, RED RIVER BASIN, OKLAHOMA. —The greject for flood control and water supply, Broken Bow Lake, Red iver Basin, Oklahoma, authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1958 (72 Stat. 309) and modified by the Flood