PUBLIC LAW 106-53—AUG. 17, 1999 113 STAT. 275 a significant impact on recreation at Folsom Reservoir shall be replaced, to the extent the water is avsiilable for purchase, by the Secretary of the Interior. (D) SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON RECREATION.—For the purposes of this paragraph, a significant impact on recreation is defined as any impact that results in a lake elevation at Folsom Reservoir below 435 feet above sea level starting on May 15 and ending on September 15 of any given year. (E) UPDATED FLOOD MANAGEMENT PLAN.—The Secretary, in cooperation with the Secretary of the Interior, shall update the flood management plan for Folsom Dam authorized by section 9159(f)(2) of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 1993 (106 Stat. 1946), to reflect the operational capabilities created by the modification authorized by subparagraph (A) and improved weather forecasts based on the Advanced Hydrologic Prediction System of the National Weather Service. (7) OAKLAND HARBOR, CALIFORNIA. — The project for navigation, Oakland Harbor, California: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated April 21, 1999, at a total cost of $252,290,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $128,081,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $124,209,000. (8) SOUTH SACRAMENTO COUNTY STREAMS, CALIFORNIA.— The project for flood control, environmental restoration and recreation. South Sacramento County streams, California: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated October 6, 1998, at a total cost of $65,500,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $41,200,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $24,300,000. (9) UPPER GUADALLTPE RIVER, CALIFORNL\. —Construction of the locally preferred plan for fiood damage reduction and recreation, Upper Guadalupe River, California, described as the Bypass (Channel Plan of the Chief of Engineers dated August 19, 1998, at a total cost of $140,328,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $44,000,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $96,328,000. (10) YUBA RIVER BASIN, CALIFORNIA.— The project for flood damage reduction, Yuba River Basin, California: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated November 25, 1998, at a total cost of $26,600,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $17,350,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $9,250,000. (11) DELAWARE BAY COASTLINE, DELAWARE AND NEW JERSEY-BROADKILL BEACH, DELAWARE.— The project for hurricane and storm damage reduction, Delaware Bay coastline, Delaw£u-e and New Jersey-Broadkill Beach, Delaware: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated August 17, 1998, at a total cost of $9,049,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $5,674,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $3,375,000, and at an estimated average annual cost of $538,200 for periodic nourishment over the 50-year life of the project, with an estimated annual Federal cost of $349,800 and an estimated annual non- Federal cost of $188,400. (12) DELAWARE BAY COASTLINE, DELAWARE AND NEW JERSEY-PORT MAHON, DELAWARE. —The project for ecosystem restoration, Delaware Bay coastline, Delaware and New Jersey- Port Mahon, Delaware: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated
�
