PUBLIC LAW 106-541—DEC. 11, 2000 114 STAT. 2585 (23) OSSINING, NEW YORK. — Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Ossining, New York. (24) SARATOGA LAKE, NEW YORK.—Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Saratoga Lake, New York. (25) SCHROON LAKE, NEW YORK. — Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Schroon Lake, New York. (26) HIGHLAND COUNTY, OHIO. — Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Rocky Fork Lake, Clear Creek floodplain. Highland County, Ohio. (27) HOCKING COUNTY, OHIO. —Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration. Long Hollow Mine, Hocking County, Ohio. (28) MIDDLE CUYAHOGA RIVER, KENT, OHIO.— Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration. Middle Cuyahoga River, Kent, Ohio. (29) TUSCARAWAS COUNTY, OHIO.— Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Huff Run, Tuscarawas County, Ohio. (30) DELTA PONDS, OREGON. —Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration. Delta Ponds, Oregon. (31) CENTRAL AMAZON CREEK, ELIGENE, OREGON. — Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Central Amazon Creek, Eugene, Oregon. (32) ELIGENE MILLRACE, ELIGENE, OREGON.—Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Eugene Millrace, Eugene, Oregon. (33) BEAR CREEK WATERSHED, MEDFORD, OREGON.— Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Bear Creek watershed, Medford, Oregon. (34) LONE PINE AND LAZY CREEKS, MEDFORD, OREGON.— Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Lone Pine and Lazy Creeks, Medford, Oregon. (35) ROSLYN LAKE, OREGON.— Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Roslyn Lake, Oregon. (36) TULLYTOWN BOROUGH, PENNSYLVANIA.— Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Tull3rtown Borough, Pennsylvania. (b) SALMON RIVER, IDAHO.—The Secretary may credit toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Salmon River, Idaho, to be carried out under section 206 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330) the cost of work (consisting of surveys, studies, and development of technical data) carried out by the non-Federal interest if the Secretary determines that the work is integral to the project. SEC. 107. SMALL PROJECTS FOR SHORELINE PROTECTION. The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the following projects and, if the Secretary determines that a project is feasible, may carry out the project under section 3 of the Act entitled "An Act authorizing Federal participation in the cost of protecting the shores of publicly owned property", approved August 13, 1946 (33 U.S.C. 426g): (1) LAKE PALOURDE, LOUISIANA.— Project for beach restoration and protection. Highway 70, Lake Palourde, St. Mary and St. Martin Parishes, Louisiana. (2) ST. BERNARD, LOUISIANA.—Project for beach restoration and protection. Bayou Road, St. Bernard, Louisiana.
�
