Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 117.djvu/2424

This page needs to be proofread.

[117 STAT. 2405]
PUBLIC LAW 107-000—MMMM. DD, 2003
[117 STAT. 2405]

PUBLIC LAW 108–173—DEC. 8, 2003

117 STAT. 2405

‘‘(iii) not otherwise have a conflict of interest with such a party. ‘‘(B) EXCEPTION.—Nothing in subparagraph (A) shall be construed to— ‘‘(i) prohibit an individual, solely on the basis of a participation agreement with a fiscal intermediary, carrier, or other contractor, from serving as a reviewing professional if— ‘‘(I) the individual is not involved in the provision of items or services in the case under review; ‘‘(II) the fact of such an agreement is disclosed to the Secretary and the individual entitled to benefits under part A or enrolled under part B, or both, or such individual’s authorized representative, and neither party objects; and ‘‘(III) the individual is not an employee of the intermediary, carrier, or contractor and does not provide services exclusively or primarily to or on behalf of such intermediary, carrier, or contractor; ‘‘(ii) prohibit an individual who has staff privileges at the institution where the treatment involved takes place from serving as a reviewer merely on the basis of having such staff privileges if the existence of such privileges is disclosed to the Secretary and such individual (or authorized representative), and neither party objects; or ‘‘(iii) prohibit receipt of compensation by a reviewing professional from a contractor if the compensation is provided consistent with paragraph (3). For purposes of this paragraph, the term ‘participation agreement’ means an agreement relating to the provision of health care services by the individual and does not include the provision of services as a reviewer under this subsection. ‘‘(3) LIMITATIONS ON REVIEWER COMPENSATION.—Compensation provided by a qualified independent contractor to a reviewer in connection with a review under this section shall not be contingent on the decision rendered by the reviewer. ‘‘(4) LICENSURE AND EXPERTISE.—Each reviewing professional shall be— ‘‘(A) a physician (allopathic or osteopathic) who is appropriately credentialed or licensed in one or more States to deliver health care services and has medical expertise in the field of practice that is appropriate for the items or services at issue; or ‘‘(B) a health care professional who is legally authorized in one or more States (in accordance with State law or the State regulatory mechanism provided by State law) to furnish the health care items or services at issue and has medical expertise in the field of practice that is appropriate for such items or services. ‘‘(5) RELATED PARTY DEFINED.—For purposes of this section, the term ‘related party’ means, with respect to a case under this title involving a specific individual entitled to benefits under part A or enrolled under part B, or both, any of the following:

VerDate 11-MAY-2000

13:59 Aug 30, 2004

Jkt 019194

PO 00000

Frm 00341

Fmt 6580

Sfmt 6581

D:\STATUTES\2003\19194PT3.001

APPS10

PsN: 19194PT3