Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 120.djvu/2644

This page needs to be proofread.
[120 STAT. 2613]
PUBLIC LAW 109-000—MMMM. DD, 2006
[120 STAT. 2613]

PUBLIC LAW 109–366—OCT. 17, 2006

120 STAT. 2613

of trial counsel’s claim of privilege by the military judge in camera and on an ex parte basis, and the delay of proceedings to permit trial counsel to consult with the department or agency concerned as to whether the national security privilege should be asserted. ‘‘(3) CONSIDERATION OF PRIVILEGE AND RELATED MATERIALS.—A claim of privilege under this subsection, and any materials submitted in support thereof, shall, upon request of the Government, be considered by the military judge in camera and shall not be disclosed to the accused. ‘‘(4) ADDITIONAL REGULATIONS.—The Secretary of Defense may prescribe additional regulations, consistent with this subsection, for the use and protection of classified information during proceedings of military commissions under this chapter. A report on any regulations so prescribed, or modified, shall be submitted to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives not later than 60 days before the date on which such regulations or modifications, as the case may be, go into effect.

Reports. Deadline.

‘‘§ 949e. Continuances ‘‘The military judge in a military commission under this chapter may, for reasonable cause, grant a continuance to any party for such time, and as often, as may appear to be just. ‘‘§ 949f. Challenges ‘‘(a) CHALLENGES AUTHORIZED.—The military judge and members of a military commission under this chapter may be challenged by the accused or trial counsel for cause stated to the commission. The military judge shall determine the relevance and validity of challenges for cause. The military judge may not receive a challenge to more than one person at a time. Challenges by trial counsel shall ordinarily be presented and decided before those by the accused are offered. ‘‘(b) PEREMPTORY CHALLENGES.—Each accused and the trial counsel are entitled to one peremptory challenge. The military judge may not be challenged except for cause. ‘‘(c) CHALLENGES AGAINST ADDITIONAL MEMBERS.—Whenever additional members are detailed to a military commission under this chapter, and after any challenges for cause against such additional members are presented and decided, each accused and the trial counsel are entitled to one peremptory challenge against members not previously subject to peremptory challenge. ‘‘§ 949g. Oaths ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—(1) Before performing their respective duties in a military commission under this chapter, military judges, members, trial counsel, defense counsel, reporters, and interpreters shall take an oath to perform their duties faithfully. ‘‘(2) The form of the oath required by paragraph (1), the time and place of the taking thereof, the manner of recording the same, and whether the oath shall be taken for all cases in which duties are to be performed or for a particular case, shall be as prescribed in regulations of the Secretary of Defense. Those regulations may provide that— ‘‘(A) an oath to perform faithfully duties as a military judge, trial counsel, or defense counsel may be taken at any

VerDate 14-DEC-2004

09:16 Jul 13, 2007

Jkt 059194

PO 00003

Frm 00092

Fmt 6580

Sfmt 6581

E:\PUBLAW\PUBL003.109

Regulations.

APPS06

PsN: PUBL003