Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 121.djvu/1234

This page needs to be proofread.
[121 STAT. 1213]
[121 STAT. 1213]
PUBLIC LAW 110-000—MMMM. DD, 2007

PUBLIC LAW 110–114—NOV. 8, 2007

121 STAT. 1213

the addendum dated June 27, 2006, to the report prepared by the city of St. Helena entitled ‘‘City of St. Helena Comprehensive Flood Protection Project, Final Environmental Impact Report’’, and dated January 2004, if the Secretary determines that the plans and designs for the project are feasible. (b) COST.—The total cost of the project to be constructed pursuant to subsection (a) shall be $30,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $19,500,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $10,500,000. (c) REIMBURSEMENT.—The non-Federal interest shall be reimbursed for any work performed by the non-Federal interest for the project described in subsection (a) that is in excess of the required non-Federal contribution toward the total cost of the project, if the Secretary determines that the work is integral to the project. SEC. 5055. UPPER CALAVERAS RIVER, STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA.

(a) REEVALUATION.—The Secretary shall reevaluate the feasibility of the Lower Mosher Slough element and the levee extensions on the Upper Calaveras River element of the project for flood control, Stockton Metropolitan Area, California, carried out under section 211(f)(3) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3683), to determine the eligibility of such elements for reimbursement under section 211 of such Act (33 U.S.C. 701b– 13). (b) SPECIAL RULES FOR REEVALUATION.—In conducting the reevaluation under subsection (a), the Secretary shall not reject a feasibility determination based on one or more of the policies of the Corps of Engineers concerning the frequency of flooding, the drainage area, and the amount of runoff. (c) REIMBURSEMENT.—If the Secretary determines that the elements referred to subsection (a) are feasible, the Secretary shall reimburse, subject to appropriations, the non-Federal interest under section 211 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 for the Federal share of the cost of such elements. SEC. 5056. RIO GRANDE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM, COLORADO, NEW MEXICO, AND TEXAS.

dkrause on GSDDPC44 with PUBLAW

(a) DEFINITIONS.—In this section, the following definitions apply: (1) RIO GRANDE COMPACT.—The term ‘‘Rio Grande Compact’’ means the compact approved by Congress under the Act of May 31, 1939 (53 Stat. 785), and ratified by the States. (2) RIO GRANDE BASIN.—The term ‘‘Rio Grande Basin’’ means the Rio Grande (including all tributaries and their headwaters) located— (A) in the State of Colorado, from the Rio Grande Reservoir, near Creede, Colorado, to the New Mexico State border; (B) in the State of New Mexico, from the Colorado State border downstream to the Texas State border; and (C) in the State of Texas, from the New Mexico State border to the southern terminus of the Rio Grande at the Gulf of Mexico. (3) STATES.—The term ‘‘States’’ means the States of Colorado, New Mexico, and Texas. (b) PROGRAM AUTHORITY.—

VerDate Aug 31 2005

13:52 Jan 23, 2009

Jkt 059194

PO 00001

Frm 01211

Fmt 6580

Sfmt 6581

M:\STATUTES\2007\59194PT1.001

APPS10

PsN: 59194PT1