FOR-TY.FoUnrn_oono1znss. rss. 11. ou. 105. 1877. 355 tions for the Report of the United States Commissioner of Fish and F¤$h**l"l€S» One thousand dollars. . FGF fuel, light, water and miscellaneous items required by the janitors Fuel, light, etc., and firemen in the proper care of the buildings, furniture, and heating f;?' O“"O‘“8B“¤OO‘ apparatus, such as brooms, mops brushes, buckets, wheelbarrows, mfffury °p"°` shovels, saws, hatchets hammers, and so-forth, for all public buildings ` under control of the Cfi-easury Department, two hundred and eighty thousand dollars. For furniture and repairs of furniture, and carpets for all public Furuituxeetc. buildings under control of the Treasury Department, seventy-five thousand dollars. For heating, ventilating, and hoistingepparatus, and repairs of same, Heating, em, for all public buildings under control of the Treasury Department, seventy five thousand dollars. For pay of custodians and janitors for all public buildings under _Pay of ouste- 00l1lJ1‘0l of the Treasury Department, seventvfive thousand dollars. duns- ' For vaults, safes, and looks, and repair of same, for all public build- Vaults, snfesetc.
under control of the Treasury Department, twenty-nve thousand
o ars. _ For photographing, engraving, and printing plans for all public build- Photograpning, ings under control or the Treasury Department one thousand dollars. <·>*<>· For the payment of John T. Morris of Texas one thousand dollars for John T. Morris. the capture of the mail robber J. U. Reed, in pursuance of a reward Qff<51‘€ll lor that purpose by the agents of Post Offico Department, and l874» Gb- 388- 111 l>\11‘SUHnce of an act of tirst session Forty third Congress. 18 Smtv MO To my J. V. Le Moyne contestant, expenses in contested election J·V· Le M°Y“°· case of Le Moyne vs Farwell, third district of Illinois, twelve hundred e ol ars; J- G- Abbott cmitestant, expenses in the contested election case of J· G- AOOOOO Abbott vs Frost, fourth district of Massachusetts two thousand dollars; YV¤l- B- Spencer- contestant expenses in contested election case of Wm B- Sl’O“OO’· Spenivev vs Morey iifrli district of Lousiana, seven hundred and thirty- lour dollars and five cents; JH11i0S H. Platt jr. contestant, expenses in contested election case of Jumw H'P1m't' Plutt vs Goode second district of Virginia, three thousand dollars; John Goode jr. contestee, expenses in contested election case of Platt JOM GOOOO vs Goode second district of Virginia, five hundred dollars; \ _ _ Joseph H. Rainey, contestee, expenses in contested election cu-se of OOO- H·R“‘“OY· Lee vs Rainey, tirst district of South Caroline, twelve hundred dollars. Samuel Lee contestant, expenses in contested election case of Lee vs Sem-=<>l LOO· Ruiney, first district of South Oarolino, twelve hundred dollars; U- W- Buttz contestant, expenses in contested election case of Buttz C- W- BOO"- vs. Mackey second district of South Carolino twelve hundred dollars; J nw Uni-alson, contestee, expenses in contested election case of Brom- JMB H*‘·¤`**1¤°¤·
vs Haralson, first district of Alabama, eleven hundred and fifty
o ars; S- S- Fenn contestant expenses in contested election case of Fenn vs S- S- Ferm- Bennett, Idano Territory, one thousand dollars; _ H- B- Strait, contestee expenses in contested election case of Cox vs H· B- Smlt- Strait second district of Minnesota, one thousand, five hundred dollars ; l E- SU. Julien (Jox contestant, expenses in case of (Jox vs Strait, Est-JOOOO COL second district of Minnesota, one thousand five hundred dollars ; R. S- Frost contestee, expenses in contested election case of Abbott R- S- F'O“"· vs. Frost, fourth district of Massachusetts, two thousand dollars; John Lynch of Mississippi expenses in contested election five hun- JOOO LYOOO dred dollars; G- B- Dai-rail of Louisiana expenses in contested election four hun- C·B-D=m¤U~ di-ed dollars; Frank Morey contestee, expenses in contested election ease of Spencer Fnmk MOM"- vs Morey fifth district of Louisiana, seven hundred and thirty-four dollars and five cents;
