Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 35 Part 1.djvu/1078

SIXTIETH ooivcimss. sm. 11. cH. sos. r90a 1061 Reed was the owner of the stall privilege, the compensation in this case not to exceed the sum of two hundred dollars for the loss of any one stall; Alexander P. Gray, upon proof that he was the owner of the stall privilege, the com ensation in this case not to exceed the sum of three hundred dollars for the loss of any one stall; Jacob N. Leapley, upon proof that he was the owner of the stall privilege, the compensation in this case not to exceed the sum of three hundred dollars for any one stall; Annie F. lrVard, Eva M. Eppley, Mamie M. Leimbach, Lydia Baptista, and George J. Stinzing, u on proof of their being the only heirs of Frederick Stinzing, deceased, and upon roof that the said Frederick Stinzing was the owner of the stall priviieges, the compensation for the loss of stalls in this case not to exceed the sum of two hundred dollars for any one stall; Eliza Shaifer and Emma Myers, upon dproof of their beingthe only heirs of Christian Wa er, decease , and upon proof that the said Christian Wagner was thi; owner of stall privilegies, the compensation for the loss of stalls in this case not to exceed the sum of] two hundred dollars for any one stall; Mary E. Gross, u on proof of er being the only heir of Barbara Brown, deceased, and) upon proof that the said Barbara Brown was the owner of stall privileges, the com ensation in this case not to exceed the sum of two hundred dollars for any one stall; Mary L. Simaker, Emma J. Ward, Cecelia Manning, and Joseph Gold, upon proof of their being the only heirs of Joseph Gold, deceased, and upon proof that the said Joseph Gold was the owner of stall privileges the compensation in {Ibis case not to exceed the sum of two hundred dollars for any one sta . Sec. 2. That when the auditor has ascertained the amount of the ,,,}§J,’°{,‘y °fug,{;;"{,; loss, as above described, in any case growin out of the removal or commissioners. destruction of the market as aforesai , he shall re rt such claims, so far as allowed by him, the total amount of suclioallowances not to exceed the sum of two thousand dollars, to the Commissioners of the District of Columbia, who shall, in case they aptprove said claims, report the same to Congress in their annual or de ciency estimates, Report t,, ,—,,,,,,,.e,,,_ for payment out of the revenues of the District of Columbia. That u*;g{;;gg”¤*i°** *0* the sum of three hundred dollars, or as much thereof as may be neces- ' sary, to pay for the services of the auditor in examining and auditing said claims for settlement, and the further sum of two hundred and fifty dollars, or so much thereof as may be necessary, to pay the actual and necessary expenses incurred in making said examination and audit, is hereby appropriated, to be paid wholly from the revenues ,__§f_}“f}[‘jf" m" ""‘ of the District of Columbia. Sec. 3. That the said auditor shall make a tabular statement of _,,.T}{f];Qf,';' ""'*‘"“‘“' the within-named claims, the persons owning the same, and the ' amount found to be due on account of each; and for the purposes hereinbefore specified said auditor shall have the power to subpcrna "`"“°"¤°"· °**`- witnesses. administer oaths, and examine witnesses under oath, and shall have full access to all of the records, books, pa rs, and vouchers of every kind whatever of the late board of publib works and the District of Columbia, and shall provide, by fair and equitable rules, for the examination of the same by claimants or their attorney. Said auditor shall give notice for the presentation of the claims m§;‘},§‘j,;;j_[*¤‘**"*W hereinbefore specified in such manner as he may deem necessary, ` and no claim shall be audited or allowed unless presented within ““‘°“'““· thirty days after the first publication of such notice; and said auditor shall make full report of all his acts and proceedings to the Commis- R“P""‘· sioners of the District of Columbia. Approved, March 4, 1909.