–391–
-391(b) If the witness is testifying as an expert, testimony of the witness in the form of opinions or inferences is limited to such opinions as the judge finds are (1) based on facts or data perceived by or personally known or made known to the witness at the hearing and (2) within the scope of the special knowledge, skill, experience or training possessed by the witness. (c) Unless the judge excludes the testimony he shall be deemed to have made the finding requisite to its admission, (d) Testimony in the form of opinions or inferences otherwise admissible under this chapter is not objectionable because it embraces the ultimate issue or issues to be decided by the trier of the fact. § 2932. Preliminary examination The judge may require that a witness before testifying in terms of opinion or inference be first examined concerning the data upon which the opinion or inference is founded. § 2933. Hypothesis for expert opinion not necessary Questions calling for the opinion of an expert witness need not be hypothetical in form unless the judge in his discretion so requires, but the witness may state his opinion and reasons therefor without first specifying data on which it is based as an hypothesis or otherwise; but upon cross-examination he may be required to specify such data. § 2934. Appointment of experts (a)If the judge determines that the appointment of expert witnesses in an action may be desirable, he shall order the parties to show cause why expert witnesses should not be appointed, and after opportunity for hearing may request nominations and appoint one or more such witnesses. If the parties agree in the selection of an expert or experts, only those agreed upon shall be appointed. Otherwise the judge may make his own selection. An expert witness shall not be appointed unless he consents to act. The judge shall determine the duties of the witness and inform him thereof at a conference in which the parties shall have an opportunity to participate. A witness so appointed shall advise the parties of his findings, if any, and may thereafter be called to testify by the judge or any party. He may be examined and cross-examined by each party. This section does not limit the parties in calling expert witnesses of their own selection and at their own expense. (b) Rule 28 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure does not apply in the Canal Zone. § 2935. Compensation of expert witnesses Expert witnesses appointed by the judge shall be entitled to reasonable compensation in such sum only as the judge may allow. Except as may be otherwise provided by statute applicable to a specific situation, the compensation shall be paid (1) in a criminal action out of such funds as may be provided by law, and (2) in a civil action by the opposing parties in equal portions to the clerk of the court at such time as the judge shall direct, and charged as costs in the case. The amount of compensation paid to an expert witness not appointed by the judge shall be a proper subject of inquiry as relevant to his credibility and the weight of his testimony. § 2936. Credibility of appointed expert witness The fact of the appointment of an expert witness by the judge may be revealed to the trier of the facts as relevant to the credibility of such witness and the weight of his testimony.
�
