Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 80 Part 1.djvu/816

This page needs to be proofread.

[80 STAT. 780]
PUBLIC LAW 89-000—MMMM. DD, 1966
[80 STAT. 780]

780

Temporary relief pending he ai^

ing.

PUBLIC LAW 89-577-SEPT. 16, 1966

[80 STAT.

or partially abated; that the period of time within which such violation should be be totally abated, as fixed in the findings upon which such order was based, was not reasonable; or that the area of the mine described in such order as the area affected by the violation referred to in such order is not so affected at the time of the filing of such application. The Secretary shall be the respondent in such proceeding, and the applicant shall send a copy of such application by registered mail or by certified mail to the Secretary at Washington, District of Columbia. (c) Immediately upon the filing of such an application the Board shall fix the time for a prompt hearing thereof. /(j\ Pending such hearing the applicant may file with the Board a \^/

,.t

,,^

- n " !

^F

i

,

"^

i-

i> e

i

written request that the Board grant such temporary relief from such order as the Board may deem ]ust and proper. Such temporary relief may be granted by the Board only after a hearing by the Board at which both the applicant and the respondent were afforded an opportunity to be heard, and only if respondent was given ample notice of the filing of applicant's request and of the time and place of the hearing thereon as fixed by the Board. (e) The Board shall not be bound by any previous findings of fact by the respondent. Evidence relating to the making of the order complained of and relating to the questions raised by the allegations of the pleadings or other questions pertinent in the proceeding may be offered by both parties to the proceeding. If the respondent claims that imminent danger or violation of a mandatory safety standard, as set out in such order, existed at the time of the filing of the application, the burden of proving the then existence of such danger or violation shall be upon the respondent, and the respondent shall present his evidence first to prove the then existence of such danger or violation. Following presentation of respondent's evidence the applicant may present his evidence, and thereupon the respondent may present evidence to rebut the applicant's evidence. (f) If the proceeding is one in which an operator seeks annulment or revision of an order made pursuant to section 8(a) the Board, upon conclusion of the hearing, shall find whether or not danger throughout the area of such mine as set out in such order existed at the time of the filing of the operator's application. If the Board finds that such danger did not then exist throughout such area of such mine, the Board shall make an order, consistent with its findings, revising or annulling the order under review. If the Board finds that such danger did then exist throughout such area of such mine, the Board shall make an order denying such application. (g) If the proceeding is one in which an operator seeks annulment or revision of an order made pursuant to section 8(b), the Board upon conclusion of the hearing shall find whether or not there was a violation of a mandatory safety standard as described in such order, at the time of the making of such order. I f the Board finds there was no such violation, the Board shall make an order annulling the order under review. If the Board finds there was such a violation, the Board shall also find whether or not such violation was totally abated at the time of the filing of the operator's application. If the Board finds that such violation was totally abated at such time, the Board shall make an order annulling the order under review. If the Board finds that such violation was not totally abated at such time, the Board shall find whether or not the period of time within which such violation should be totally abated fixed under section 8(b) or section 9(b) should be extended. If the Board finds that such period of time should