Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 81.djvu/1026

This page needs to be proofread.

[81 STAT. 992]
PUBLIC LAW 90-000—MMMM. DD, 1968
[81 STAT. 992]

992

PRIVATE LAW 90-17-JUNE 26, 1967

[81 STAT.

Private Law 90-17 AN ACT For the relief of Cecil A. Rhodes.

June 26, 1967 [H. R. 1526]

C e c i l A. Rhodes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Rejrresentatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the employment of Cecil A. Rhodes of Jacksonville, Florida, in a civilian position by the Post Office Department during periods of service on active duty with the United States Navy beginning on March 27, 1960, and ending October 4, 1965, shall be deemed lawful, and he shall be entitled to all of the compensation and other benefits to which he would have been entitled had he not been serving on active duty during such period. Approved June 26, 1967.

Private Law 90-18 June 26, 1967 [H. R. 2048]

William J o h n Masterton and L o u i s Vincent Nanne. 66 Stat. 163. 8 USC 1101 note.

AN ACT For the relief of William John Masterton and Louis Vincent Nanne. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That, for the purposes of the Immigration and Nationality Act, William John Masterton and Louis Vincent Nanne shall be held and considered to have been lawfully admitted to the United States for permanent residence as of September 24, 1959. Approved June 26, 1967.

Private Law 90-19 June 28, 1967 [H. R. 4445]

Aurex Corporation.

AN ACT For the relief of Aurex Corporation. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assemhied, That the Secretary of the Treasury is authorized and directed to pay, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, to Aurex Corporation, an Illinois corporation, the sum of $172,550 in full satisfaction of its claims against the United States for damages and losses suffered as the result of serious errors in excess profits determination incident to contract renegotiation in accordance with the opinion of the United States Court of Claims in the congressional reference case, Aurex Corporation against The United States, numbered 12-58, decided April 15, 1966. No part of the amount appropriated in this Act in excess of 20 per centum thereof shall be paid or delivered to or received by any agent or attorney on account of services rendered in connection with this claim, and the same shall be unlawful, any contract to the contrary notwithstanding. Any person violating the provisions of this Act shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be fined m any sum not exceeding $1,000. Approved June 28, 1967.