Page:Vol 1 History of Mexico by H H Bancroft.djvu/457

This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
ALLEGIANCE SWORN.
337

fully grasp the situation at the capital, indignation struggled with grief at the dismal prospect. Others recalled the prophecy that the empire would terminate with Montezuma,[1] whose very name appeared fraught with evil omen," and were quite reconciled to the inevitable., So were most of them, for that matter, either through belief in the myth or from a sense of duty to their master. One of the eldest nobles broke the oppressive silence by declaring his sorrow at witnessing the grief of their beloved sovereign and hearing the announcement of coming changes. But since the time had come for the fulfilment of divine decrees, they, as devout and dutiful subjects, could only submit. Again their grief broke forth, though many a bitter glance was called up by the allusion to changes in store for them. Observing the bad impression, Cortés hastened to assure them that Montezuma would not only remain the great emperor he had always been, and his vassals be confirmed in their dignities and possessions, but that their domain and power would be increased. . The changes proposed were merely intended to stop wars, to enlighten them on matters with which they were as yet unacquainted, and to promote general welfare. One after another, beginning with Montezuma, they now swore allegiance, and gave promise of service and tribute, after which they were dismissed with thanks for their compliance.[2]

  1. 'Tenia del oraculo de sus dioses respuesta muchas vezes. . . .q͏̄ perderia la silla a los ocho años de su reynado, y q͏̄ por esto nunca quiso hazer guerra a los Españoles,. . . . Bien que por otro cabo lo tenia por burla, pues auia mas dezisiete años q͏̄ era rey.' Gomara, Hist. Mex., 134-5; Acosta, Hist. Ind., 502-3.
  2. Cortés, Cartas, 91, 98-9; Herrera, dec. ii. lib. ix. çap. iv.; Tapia, Rel., in Icazbalceta, Col. Doc., ii. 580-1. The allegiance was tendered before Secretary Pedro Fernandez. Bernal Diaz, Hist. Verdad., 81. Solis assumes that Montezuma of his own accord offered allegiance and tribute, in the hope that this would fill the measure of the Spaniards' expectations and cause them to depart. In that case the general grief must have been well counterfeited. He regards this act as giving legality to the conquest. Hist. Mex., ii. 23-32. Prescott supposes that the submission was prompted less by fear than by conscience — conscientious obedience to the myth. Mex., ii. 198. Oviedo looks on the tears as evidence of unwillingness, and thinks that either the emperor was very pusillanimous, or the will of God clearly manifest. iii. 297. Ac-