Page:Vol 2 History of Mexico by H H Bancroft.djvu/292

This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
272
ESTRADA’S RULE.

him no farther than the Islands. Sandoval, Andrés de Tapia, and several other captains joined the expedition, to present claims for services before the sovereign; also some two score of native princes and chieftains, conspicuous among whom was a son of Montezuma, and a son of Maxixcatzin.[1]

  1. 48 Chimalpain names two sons of Montezuma, Pedro, from whom descended the Condes de Montezuma and Tula — see Hist. Mex., i. 460, this series — and Martin Cortés Nezahualtecolotl, also a nephew of the late emperor, Francisco de Alvarado Matlaccohuatzin, Gabriel, a son of the king of Tlacopan, Baltasar, Felipe, Juan, sons respectively of the lords of Culhuacan, Cuitlahuac, and Cempoala. He also gives the baptismal and native names of three Tlascaltec chiefs and of others. Hist. Conq., ii. 163-4. Among the Tlascaltecs, Bernal Diaz mentions a son of Xicotencatl. They numbered 39 in all, those at least who reached Spain, as shown by a decree of the emperor ordering dresses and entertainment to be provided for them. Ternaux-Compans., Voy., série ii. tom. v. 87-8. From this it appears that the son of Montezuma now taken was Martin, not Pedro. Among the other six names mentioned is Lorenzo of Tlascala. I may mention the following as authorities supplemental to those quoted in preceding chapters: Cortés, Escritos Sueltos 102-26, 213-14; Oviedo iii. 494-5, 519-27; Pacheco and Cárdenas, Col. Doc., v. 68-96; vi.; xii. 287-91, 406-17, 480-90; xiii. 73-85, 115-17, 144-6, 348-56, 400-11; xiv. 65-9, 395-410; xv. 446-7; xxiii. 368-84; xxvi. 160-3, 195-280; Libro de Cabildo MS., 121, passim; Torquemada i. 597-9; iii. 190; Archivo Mex., Doc., i. 141-4, 161-85, 239 et seq.; ii. 18, passim; Ramirez, Doc., MS., 285-9; Col. Doc. Inéd., i. 14-30, 101-2; Beaumont, Crón. Mich., iii. 229-30; iv. 99-100; Puga, Cedulurio, 15-25, 43-4, 79; Monumentos Domin. Esp., MS., 69; Ramirez, Proceso 73, 157, 188-91; Iztlilxochitl, Relaciones, in Kingsborough's Mex. Antiq., ix. 447; Ternaux-Compans, Voy., série ii. tom. v. 19-27, 44-8; Chimalpain, Hist. Conq., ii. 158-60; Mex., Extr. de Cedulas, MS., 5; Vetancvrt, Trat. Mex., 6; Remesal, Hist. Chyapa 11-14; Alaman, Disert., i. 245-50; ii. 305-8; Brasseur de Bourbourg, Hist. Nat. Civ., iv. 722-34; Cavo, Tres Siglos i. 56-95; Prescott's Mex., 306-11, 452-4; also notes in Mex. eds.; Gonzalez Dávila, Teatro Ecles., i. 7; Helps' Span. Conq., iii. 60-4, 144-67; Salazar y Olarte, Cong. Mex., 194-9, 323-67; Mayer's Mex. Aztec i. 87-8; Galvano's Discov., 36-7; Arroniz, Hist. Orizaba, 310-14; Cortés, Brieven, ii. 287-90; Pap. Var., cliii. pt. ix. 13-16; Aa, Naaukeurige Versameling xi. 22-32, 56-68; Dicc. Univ., i. 83-6; Kerr's Col. Voy., iv. 283-8; Peralta, Not. Hist., 138-9, 339; Soc. Mex. Geog., Boletin, viii. 477; Solis, Hist. Mex. (ed. 1843), 479-81; Russell's Hist. Am., 256; Zamacois, Hist. Mex., iv. 364-463; Rivera, Hist. Jalapa i. 45-9; Id., Gob. Mex., i. 22-3; Lerdo de Tejada, Apunt. Hist., pt. iv. 245-7; Pizarro y Orellana, Varones Ilvstres 117-24.