Page:Vol 5 History of Mexico by H H Bancroft.djvu/69

This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
UNITED STATES AND GREAT BRITAIN.
49

treme east of Texas, as the dividing line. The period for the ratification of the new treaty having elapsed, an additional article validated it on the 5th of April, 1831, and the whole was ratified by the two governments in 1832. A treaty also of amity, commerce, and navigation was entered into April 5, 1831, which was ratified by the high contracting parties respectively January 14, and April 5, 1832.[1] Several questions occurred in the years 1826 and 1827 that were subjects of discussion between the two governments, such as claims of American citizens for robberies, impressiment of seamen, and seizure and confiscation of vessels by Mexican authorities, of which it is unnecessary to give details here.[2]

Great Britain at the congresses convened in Europe to treat of Spanish American affairs had reserved her right to act as best suited her interests, manifesting a resolve to prevent the intervention of any power save Spain, to which she had left the priority of right. to obtain by negotiation what advantages she could.[3] Had it not been for the energetic and timely declarations of England and the United States against interference by the European powers, constituting the so-called holy alliance, France, in view of the successes obtained in Naples, Piedmont, and Spain, would

  1. Both treaties officially published by the Mexican government, March 7, 1833. Mex. Derecho Intern., 1st pt 122-50; Am. St. Pap., For. Rel., iv. 422-626, 630-703, v. 907-10; Id. (new set), vi. 366, 578-613, 946-02, 1006-14; U. S. Govt, cong. 19, ses. 1, H. Ex. Doc., 142, vol. viii.; Id., cong. 22, ses. 1, H. Ex. Doc., 225, 22-7, in Mex. Treaties, i. no. 1; U. S. Pap., ii. no. 25, cong. 19, ses. 2; Cong. Debates, 1825-6, i. ind. p. viii.; U. S. Acts and Resol., 141-2, App. 24-30, 22d cong. 1st sess.; U. S. Govt., cong. 16, scs. 2, H. Jour. (Index Spain and S. Am.); Niles' Reg., xxvii. 270, 334, xxix. 384, xxx. 202, 421, xxxi. 136, 301, xxxiii. 19, xxxiv. 245, xxxv. 20, 41, 71, 213, 242, xl. 228-9; Am. Ann. Reg., 1831-2, Pub. Doc. 76-91; Mex. Mem. Rel., 1827, 10-113; Id., 1828, 6; Id., 1831, 2-5; Mex. Mem. Hacienda, 1831, 113-5; Gaz. de Mex., 1826, May 16, 2-3, and June 6, 3-4; Arrillaga, Recop., 1836, Jan. to June, 453-60; Cor. Fed. Mex., 1827, Feb. 19, 3; 1828, Jan. 13, 4; Dublan and Lozano, Leg. Mex., ii. 456-69; Tornel, Breve Reseña Hist., 79-80; Mora, Revol. Mex., 358-68; Bustamante, Voz de la Patria, ii. no. 33, 3-4, vi. 160-7; Poussin's The United States, 358-68; Id., De la Puissance, i. 412-3; Santangelo, Cong. Pan., 145-61; Cuevas, Porvenir Mex., 373-82; Mofras, Explor. Oregon, ii. 464-6; Filisola, Mem., i. 90-108.
  2. Niles' Reg. . xxxi. 23, 178, 310, xxxii. 79.
  3. In 1822 the Spanish court addressed itself to foreign powers deprecating precipitancy in their decision on the subject. Manif. Gob. Esp., 1-8.