ister in London, Sebastian Camacho, was invited by the French government to enter into a sort of arrangenent, to which it would not give the name of treaty, but merely that of provisional convention. By this means the chief points were arranged for the regulation of trade between the two countries. It was equally important to France, whose commercial interests were daily growing larger in Mexico, and to the republic, as a preliminary step toward the formal recognition by the former, and the conclusion of a treaty embodying the usual words and forms of such instruments. Affairs remained in this state till 1828, when the French government concluded to despatch to Mexico a commissioner of the same character as that first sent out by England, to obtain data that might serve as a basis for future action. A serious political disturbance, however, in Mexico, prevented the agent from going to his destination. Then followed the political changes of 1830 in France. Meantime, Señor Gorostiza, Mexican minister in London, under instructions of his government, went to Paris, and negotiated a treaty which the Mexican government afterward failed to ratify.[1] Treaties of amity, commerce, and navigation were, however, concluded with several European nations during this period.[2]
- ↑ Mexico's equality with other sovereign nations was at stake, the alternate priority in the heading of the two drafts of the treaty having been refused by the French minister of state. Bustamante, Voz de la Patria, ii. no. 12, 5; Mora, Revol. Mex., i. 340-52; Suarez y Nararro, Hist. Méx., 71; Gaz. de Mex., 1826, Nov. 25, 3; Cor. Fed. Mex., 1827, Aug. 18, 1-3; La Palanca, 1826, Dec. 11, 4; Niles' Reg., xxvii. 218.
- ↑ Prussia in 1826 had attempted the subterfuge of keeping a commercial agent in Mexico without a treaty having been entered into between the two nations, but it was not permitted. In following years treaties of amity, commerce, and navigation were made with that kingdom and others, namely, Hanover, Denmark, and the Netherlands; and later with the Hanseatic cities, Wurtemburg, Bavaria, etc. Gaz. de Mex., 1826, May, 13, 4; Mex. Col. Ley., 1829, 30, 35-16, 55-73; Arrillaga, Recop., 1833, 63-73, 137-56, 226, 273-322, 464; Dublan and Lozano, Leg. Mex., ii. 136-9, 143-9, 184-94, 331-3, 431-4; Mex. Mem. Rel., 1833, 1-5, 16-20; Bustamante, Voz de la Patria, MS., vi. 102;, Niles' Register, xxxii. 74-85.
policy. Gaz. de Mex., 1826, May 18, 2-3; Bustamante, Voz de la Patria, ii. no. 12, 6; Ramirez y Sesma, Col. Dec., 299; Dublan and Lozano, Leg. Mex., i. 781.
