Smith v. McIver

Syllabus

669015Smith v. McIver — Syllabus

Court Documents

Opinion of the Court

United States Supreme Court

22 U.S. 532

Smith v. McIver

APPEAL from the Circuit Court of West Tennessee. Feb. 10th.

This cause was argued by Mr. Eaton, and Mr. Isaacks, ^[1] for the appellants; and by Mr. White, and Mr. Spaten, ^[2] for the respondents. Feb. 20th.

Mr. Chief Justice MARSHALL, delivered the opinion of the Court.

Notes edit

↑ They cited 1 Madd. Ch. 130, 180. Polk v. Wendell, 5 Wheat. Rep. 293. 303. Cowp. 208. 1 Burr. 450. 2 Str. 592. Winchester v. Evans, Cooke's Tenn. Rep. 420. Polk v. Wendell, 9 Cranch, 87. Burton v. Williams, 3 Wheat. Rep. 529.
↑ They cited 4 Johns. Rep. 510. 5 Hayn. 106. 206. 216.

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse

[refa-1] They cited 1 Madd. Ch. 130, 180. Polk v. Wendell, 5 Wheat. Rep. 293. 303. Cowp. 208. 1 Burr. 450. 2 Str. 592. Winchester v. Evans, Cooke's Tenn. Rep. 420. Polk v. Wendell, 9 Cranch, 87. Burton v. Williams, 3 Wheat. Rep. 529.

[refb-2] They cited 4 Johns. Rep. 510. 5 Hayn. 106. 206. 216.

[1]

[2]