Open main menu

The Bank of the United States v. Dandridge


Court Documents
Dissenting Opinion
Marshall

United States Supreme Court

25 U.S. 64

The Bank of the United States  v.  Dandridge

Feb. 6th and 7th.

THIS cause was very elaborately argued by the Attorney General and Mr. Webster, for the plaintiffs, and by Mr. Tazewell, for the defendant. But as the arguments are very fully stated, and the authorities cited and commented on, in the opinions of the learned judges, it has not been thought necessary to insert them. Feb. 28th.

Mr. Justice STORY delivered the opinion of the Courts.

NotesEdit

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).