United States v. Van Duzee (185 U.S. 278)

United States Supreme Court

185 U.S. 278

United States  v.  Van Duzee

 Argued: March 24, 1902. --- Decided: April 28, 1902

This is an appeal from a judgment of the court of claims entered in favor of the appellee (claimant below) for the sum of $993. 35 Ct. Cl. 214. The conclusion of law by which the court determined that judgment ought to be entered against the United States was based upon the following:

'Finding of Facts.

'I. The claimant, Alonzo J. Van Duzee, was clerk of the circuit court of the United States for the northern district of Iowa from August, 1882, to December 31, 1897, duly qualified and acting.

II. During said period he made up his accounts United States, and presented the same, duly verified, to the United States court for approval in the presence of the district attorney, and orders approving the same as being just and according to law were entered of record. Said accounts were then presented to the accounting officers of the Treasury Department for payment. In the settlement of the account from July 1, 1897, to September 30, 1897, part was paid, but payment of services embraced in Finding III. was refused.

'III. Item 1. For filing and entering 9,930 separate and distinct records and other official papers appertaining to the offices of commissioners of the circuit court of the United States for the northern district of Iowa, which were deposited by said commissioners under the act of May 28, 1896, in the office of the clerk of the circuit court for said district, at 10 cents each as follows: (a) Dockets and records, 16.................................. $1.60 (b) Information or complaints, 2,997....................... 299.70 (c) Warrants, 1,984......................................... 198.40 (d) Subpoenas, 1,899........................................ 189.90 (e) Documentary testimony, 446............................... 44.60 (f) Bonds, 649............................................... 64.90 (g) Affidavits, 445.......................................... 44.50 (h) Mittimus, 446............................................ 44.60 (i) Search Warrants, 22....................................... 2.20 (j) Applications for discharge of poor convicts, 587......... 58.70 (k) Oaths for discharge as poor convicts, 232................ 23.20 (l) Mandates to jailer for discharge as poor convicts, 169... 16.90 (m) Applications for seaman's wages, 24....................... 2.40 (n) Summons on applications for seaman's wages, 13............ 1.30 (o) Praecipe, 1................................................ .10

---

$993 00

'IV. During the period when the aforesaid services were rendered, it was the settled practice under the verbal orders of the court for the clerk to file all papers sent up by the commissioners in said district; and by a written rule of court entered of record, it was made the duty of the clerk in cases wherein the commissioner held the defendant to appear at court to file the papers and transcripts sent up by the commissioner, and to forthwith enter the case on the docket, which rule is as follows:

"Commissioner's papers.

"Upon receipt by the clerk of the papers and transcript of proceedings before a commissioner wherein the party is held to appear at court, the same shall be properly filed and the same entered upon the docket.' 'The aforesaid services were performed in compliance with said practice and rule of court.'

Assistant Attorney General Pradt and Mr. Philip M. Ashford for appellant.

Mr. Charles C. Lancaster for appellee.

Mr. Justice White, after making the foregoing statement, delivered the opinion of the court:

Notes