Hello, JusBer88, and welcome to Wikisource! Thank you for joining the project. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:


You may be interested in participating in

Add the code {{active projects}}, {{PotM}} or {{Collaboration/MC}} to your page for current Wikisource projects.

You can put a brief description of your interests on your user page and contributions to another Wikimedia project, such as Wikipedia and Commons.

Have questions? Then please ask them at either

I hope you enjoy contributing to Wikisource, the library that is free for everyone to use! In discussions, please "sign" your comments using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username if you're logged in (or IP address if you are not) and the date. If you need help, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question here (click edit) and place {{helpme}} before your question.

Again, welcome! — billinghurst sDrewth 03:10, 9 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Template:Infobox SCOTUS case??? Edit

We already have templates available for court cases and they have been designed around the US court system and applied there currently. It would seem preferable to utilise those if templates are required, and where they are lacking that they are correspondingly improved. See Template:Case, Template:USSCcase and Category:Law templatesbillinghurst sDrewth 09:17, 1 March 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Okay, I was just trying to add something a little bit comprehensive, but it turned out to be a little bit more work than I had the time to invest in. I'll go ahead and just set up the page to redirect to the template you mentioned. Does that work? --JusBer88 (talk) 15:38, 1 March 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

To note that this is not the encyclopaedia, this is the source. As we are looking to publish/reproduce the original work, we would not normally look to infoboxes for the body of a work, though we understand that there is certain metadata that can be represented from these types of works. Years ago that data was displayed within the body, whereas, now we would look to represent in the Header if possible, and reserve the body for the reproduced work. — billinghurst sDrewth 03:42, 2 March 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Re page deletions Edit

Hi. Re your email, the issue isn't the content, it is the contentless pages. If you don't have the content, then please don't create the pages, happy for you to create the links, however, creating empty pages is problematic. Thanks. — billinghurst sDrewth 11:00, 13 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

OCGA formatting Edit

For your (hopefully) future work on the OCGA, I would recommend that you please conform your formatting to that expressed in Title 1 of the same. Thank you. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 23:50, 18 May 2020 (UTC).Reply[reply]

Out of date? Edit

I'm just guessing that your description at Wikisource:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases#Participants is out of date by now. Cheers! BD2412 T 16:28, 27 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yes, thank you! JusBer88 (talk) 21:01, 27 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

My pleasure (and belated congratulations on achieving your profession). Cheers! BD2412 T 03:29, 28 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]