Redpepper

This is Redpepper's page.

Rusk documents

Hi, I have split Rusk documents into separate pages on Index:Rusk documents, and the source of the images has been moved to Talk:Rusk documents. Are you OK with that?

Also, the name "Rusk documents" sounds like it applies to a set of documents, rather than to this single document. Should Rusk documents be moved to a more specific page name? John Vandenberg 01:43, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

"Rusk note of 1951" sounds like a good name. John Vandenberg 11:41, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Splitting documents into pages only works when the images for each page is available.

"Rusk note" / "Rusk memorandum" are both ok, but they are still ambiguously named, i.e. there are likely to be many memorandum authored by Rusk. However if this is the most notable memorandum authored by Rusk then it is an appropriate way to name the pages.

John Vandenberg 03:12, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

See "Index:Rusk documents" for how I did it. Our help page "Help:Side by side image view for proofreading" also describes how to do it. If you need help, give me links to the image files, and I will set it up for you. Im off the bed now; ill be back online in ~8 hours. John Vandenberg 14:03, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Looks good. I've altered the pages behind Memorandum in regard to the Liancourt Rocks (Takeshima Island) controversy, so that the text mode flows between pages without interruption. i.e. if the reader wants to see what text was on each page, they can do that by going to the index. John Vandenberg 22:29, 10 December 2007 (UTC)