Woolley v. Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc.

Woolley v. Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc.  (1985) 
by the Supreme Court of New Jersey
Syllabus
Court Documents
Opinion of the Court


SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY

99 N.J. 284; 491 A.2d 1257

RICHARD M. WOOLLEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,  v.  HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT

On certification to the Superior Court, Appellate Division.

No. A-98  Argued: March 21, 1983 --- Decided: May 9, 1985

Timothy G. Hagan, a member of the Michigan bar, argued the cause for appellant (Rabner & Allcorn, attorneys; Thomas Tucker, on the briefs).

Frederick C. Kentz, III, argued the cause for respondent (Crummy, Del Deo, Dolan & Purcell, attorneys).

For reversal and remandment — Chief Justice Wilentz and Justices Clifford, Schreiber, Handler, Pollock, O'Hern and Garibaldi. Opposed — None. The opinion of the Court was delivered by Wilentz, C.J.

This work is in the public domain in the U.S. because it is an edict of a government, local or foreign. See § 313.6(C)(2) of the Compendium II: Copyright Office Practices. Such documents include "legislative enactments, judicial decisions, administrative rulings, public ordinances, or similar types of official legal materials" as well as "any translation prepared by a government employee acting within the course of his or her official duties."

These do not include works of the Organization of American States, United Nations, or any of the UN specialized agencies. See Compendium III § 313.6(C)(2) and 17 U.S.C. 104(b)(5).


Nuvola apps important.svg
A non-American governmental edict may still be copyrighted outside the U.S. Similar to {{PD-in-USGov}}, the above U.S. Copyright Office Practice does not prevent U.S. states or localities from holding copyright abroad, depending on foreign copyright laws and regulations.