Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association/Concurrence Alito

4392749Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association — Concurring OpinionSamuel Alito
Court Documents
Case Syllabus
Opinion of the Court
Concurring Opinion
Alito
Dissenting Opinions
Thomas
Breyer

Justice Alito, with whom The Chief Justice joins, con­ curring in the judgment.

The California statute that is before us in this case rep­ resents a pioneering effort to address what the state leg­ islature and others regard as a potentially serious social problem: the effect of exceptionally violent video games on impressionable minors, who often spend countless hours im­ mersed in the alternative worlds that these games create. Although the California statute is well intentioned, its terms are not framed with the precision that the Constitution de­ mands, and I therefore agree with the Court that this partic­ ular law cannot be sustained.

I disagree, however, with the approach taken in the Court’s opinion. In considering the application of unchang­ ing constitutional principles to new and rapidly evolving technology, this Court should proceed with caution. We should make every effort to understand the new technology. We should take into account the possibility that developing technology may have important societal implications that will become apparent only with time. We should not jump to the conclusion that new technology is fundamentally the same as some older thing with which we are familiar. And we should not hastily dismiss the judgment of legislators, who may be in a better position than we are to assess the implications of new technology. The opinion of the Court exhibits none of this caution.

In the view of the Court, all those concerned about the effects of violent video games—federal and state legislators, educators, social scientists, and parents—are unduly fearful, for violent video games really present no serious problem. See ante, at 798–801, 803–804. Spending hour upon hour controlling the actions of a character who guns down scores of innocent victims is not different in “kind” from reading a description of violence in a work of literature. See ante, at 798.

The Court is sure of this; I am not. There are reasons to suspect that the experience of playing violent video games just might be very different from reading a book, listening to the radio, or watching a movie or a television show.


I edit