Davis v. Currie/Opinion of the Court

Davis v. Currie
Opinion of the Court by James Clark McReynolds
870710Davis v. Currie — Opinion of the CourtJames Clark McReynolds

United States Supreme Court

266 U.S. 182

Davis  v.  Currie

 Argued: Oct. 10, 1924. --- Decided: Nov 17, 1924


This writ must be dismissed. The petition therefor declared: The sole question presented is: 'Can damages for humiliation and wounded feelings be awarded the respondent against the petitioner, the United States Railroad Administration, under the provisions of the Federal Control Act [Comp. St. 1918, Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1919, §§ 3115 3/4 a to 3115 3/4 p], the proclamations of the President, and the general orders of the Director General pursuant thereto?'

At the hearing counsel relied on the following: 'The judgment against the Director General of Railroads for wounded feelings and humiliation arising out of a wanton, willful, and malicious act of his servant is unauthorized, involving, essentially, the infliction of a penalty upon the government.' The argument was that, although the trial court distinctly limited the jury to actual damages, nevertheless, it necessarily follows from the size of the verdict that punitive damages were assessed against and a penalty was imposed upon the United States.

The petition did not state the case presented at the bar.

Dismissed.

Notes edit

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse