Norman v. Baltimore & or


Norman v. Baltimore & or
by Charles Evans Hughes
Syllabus
885714Norman v. Baltimore & or — SyllabusCharles Evans Hughes
Court Documents

United States Supreme Court

294 U.S. 240

Norman  v.  Baltimore & or

 Argued: Jan. 8, 9, 10, 1935. --- Decided: Feb 18, 1935

[Syllabus from pages 240-242 intentionally omitted]

Messrs. Emanuel Redfield and Dalton Dwyer, both of New York City, for petitioner Norman.

[Argument of Counsel from pages 243-248 intentionally omitted]

Mr. Frederick H. Wood, of New York City, for respondent Baltimore & O.R. co.

[Argument of Counsel from pages 248-250 intentionally omitted]

Mr. Homer S.C.ummings, Atty. Gen., for the United States.

[Argument of Counsel from pages 251-272 intentionally omitted]

Mr. Stanley Reed, of Washington, D.C., for petitioner Reconstruction Finance Corporation.

[Argument of Counsel from pages 272-278 intentionally omitted]

Mr. Edward J. White, of St. Louis, Mo., for petitioners Trustees of Missouri Pacific Railroad Co.

Messrs. James H. McIntosh and Edward W. Bourne, both of New York City, for respondents.

[Argument of Counsel from pages 279-290 intentionally omitted]

Mr. Chief Justice HUGHES delivered the opinion of the Court.

Notes edit

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse