Page:Archaeological Journal, Volume 9.djvu/225

This page needs to be proofread.

THE ABBEY CHURCH OF DORCHESTER. 105 completed. This choir aisle is fully as large in every dimension as the choir alone, without the later addition of the presl)jterj; in breadth I think it exceeds it. It forms in fact a sort of second church of itself, and can in nowise be regarded as an ordinary aisle, a mere accessory and subordinate to the choir. Now whether this be or be not either justness of architectural proportion or propriety of ecclesiastical arrangement, it is bej'ond all question a source of extraordinary effect. The appearance of spaciousness produced is wonderful. But it is clear that such a structure as this could not have been introduced into an ordinary' Cathedral or Conventual Church, without interfering in an unpleasant manner with its unity of design ; once granting the peculiar arrangement of Dorchester Church, this was by far the most majestic form that it could have received. The absence of a clerestory involves a distinct roof to the aisle ; how necessary this is may be shown b}"- looking at the north aisle of this very choir, where the low wall and steep lean-to roof are only adapted to an edifice furnished with a clerestory. As the soutli aisle is rather the later of the two, the architect may reasonably be supposed to have taken warning by this failure. He built then his aisle with a distinct gable ; but, once give an aisle a distinct gable, and its character is altogether changed ; it is no longer the mere adjunct, dependent upon the larger building to which it is attached, and as it were crouching under its shadow : it at once assumes a character of independence, and must be treated accordingl3^ The builder at once grasped this idea ; he gave his aisle the full dimensions of the choir, and we see what a majestic structure is the result. And we may remark the pains taken to prevent the east ends of the presbytery and the aisle from presenting a double of each other. I am not here speaking vdth perfect historical exactness, as the present east end of the presbytery is later than that of the aisle ; consequently whatever commendation is due on this score belongs to the architect of the former. There is a certain analogy between the two, so strong, that the earlier probably suggested the later ; still there is a remark- able diversity, amounting even to contrast. In both there is an attempt to occup}'- the whole space, but in quite different ways ; in the one it is by actually filling it up with an expanse of tracery ; in the other by scattering distinct windows over its surface. In both we find the central buttress ; but, while VOL. IX. z