Nemo potest facere signa quæ tu facis nisi Deus.
2 Macc. xiv. 15. Deus qui signis evidentibus suam portionem protegit.
Volumus signum videre de cælo, tentantes eum. Luke, xi. 16.
Generatio prava signum quærit; et non dabitur.[1]
Et ingemiscens ait: Quid generatio ista signum quærit? (Mark, viii. 12.) They asked a sign with an evil intention.
Et non poterat facere.[2] And yet he promises them the sign of Jonah, the great and wonderful miracle of his resurrection.
Nisi videritis signa, non creditis.[3] He does not blame them for not believing unless there are miracles, but for not believing unless they are themselves spectators of them.
Antichrist in signis mendacibus, says Saint Paul, 2 Thess. ii.
Secundum operationem Satanæ, in seductione iis qui pereunt et quod charitatem veritatis non receperunt ut salvi fierent, ideo mittet illis Deus operationes erroris ut credant mendacio.[4]
As in the passage of Moses: Tentat enim vos Deus, utrum diligatis eum.
Ecce prædixi vobis: vos ergo videte.
843
Here is not the country of truth. She wanders unknown amongst men. God has covered her with a veil, which leaves her unrecognised by those who do not hear her voice. Room is opened for blasphemy, even against the truths that are at least very likely. If the truths of the Gospel are published the contrary is published too, and the questions are obscured, so that the people cannot distinguish. And they ask, "What have you to make you believed rather than others? What sign do you give? You have only words, and so have we. If you had miracles, good and well." That doctrine ought to be supported by miracles is a truth, which they misuse in order to revile doctrine. And if miracles happen, it is said that miracles are not enough
