position of Abraham and Lot at the time was on a mount east of Bethel; and as the site of Bethel is known, it was not difficult to find the mount east of it. It was reasonably identified by Rev. Canon Williams, and his conclusions were confirmed in 1865 by Colonel Sir C. Wilson. It has been shown that if the cities had been south of the Dead Sea, human vision could not possibly have extended so far, to distinguish anything. But north of the sea, in the Round or Plain, Lot would be able to perceive them. Accordingly, when the friendly conference ended, he journeyed eastward from the mount near Bethel, in order to reach his new home in Sodom.
The vision of Lot had extended across the plain, to
Zoar and no farther, because the plain was bounded by the
high mountains of Moab. Dr Tristram believes that he
has identified Zoar, the fifth city of the Plain, the "little
city" to which Lot fled after the convulsion. Standing
on Mount Nebo, he detected the ruins a little in front of
him, almost in a line with Jericho. The ruins were on a
low brow of ground, and thus correspond to the description
that Lot rested in this city on his way to the mountains,
and afterwards went up into the mountain and dwelt in a
cave. The ruins are still called Ziara, which does not
differ much from the Greek spelling (
Greek characters), nor very
widely from the Hebrew.
Is it possible to discover any relics of the four larger cities? Although destroyed by fire, they may not have been utterly annihilated, any more than Pompeii; but if their remains are hiding beneath the dust, the dust keeps its secret well. Major Conder rode day by day over almost every acre of ground between Jericho and the Dead Sea, and could not detect any mound or sign of a buried city. The whole was a white desert, except near the hills, where rich herbage grows after the rains. The time of year was most favourable for such exploration, because no
