Page:Copyright, Its History And Its Law (1912).djvu/698

This page needs to be proofread.

666 COPYRIGHT

1898 Miles V. Amer. U. S. C. C. J. Lacombe, Hamlin Copr.

News Co. C. & D. 29

Specific license for limited use of illustrations enforced, 236

1898 MaUoryii.Mackaye U. S. C. C. J. Wheeler, 86 F. R. 122

Employer entitled to copyright in dramatic works written under salary, 188

1899 Mackayeii.Mallory U. S. C. C. J. Wallace, 92 F. R. 749

App. "Modifying" Mallory ». Mackaye, but upholding right of em- ployer

1899 Bennett v. Can U.S. C. C. App. J. Thomas, 96 F. R. 213

Copyright invalidated (under old law) by failure to deposit writ- ten description of picture, 236

1899 Boosey v. Whight Ct. App. J. Lindley, [1900] i Ch. 122

Perforated music roll not "copy" of sheet music, 208; marginal directions neither music nor literary composition, 208

1899 Brady v. Daly U. S. Sup. Ct. J. Peckham, 175 U. S. 148

Single situation protected as integral part of drama, 191 ; dam- ages, not penalty, under copyright statute, 272 1899 Daly II. Walrath N.Y.App. Div. J. Bartlett, 40 App. Div. 220

Prior printing abroad forfeits American dramatic rights, 181 1899 Green ». Irish Irish Ct. of L. J. Fitz-Gibbon, [1899] i Ir.

Independent App. Rep. 386

Newspaper Uable for infringement, though without knowledge, copyr. illustration printed as advertisement, 236, 253

1899 Holmes u. Hurst U. S. Sup. Ct. J. Brown, 174 U. S. 82

Copyright protects intellectual production of author, not merely the particular form. "Book" not confined to bound volume, 67 1899 McDonald 11. Hearst U. S. C. C. J. De Haven, 95 F. R. 656

Employer cannot be held to penal responsibility for act of agent, 271 1899 MaxweU v. Good- U. S. C. C. J. Seaman, 93 F. R. 665

win Playright in unpublished work, inherent under common law, 187

1899 Murphy v. Chris- N. Y. App. J. Cullen, 38 N. Y. App.

tian Press Assoc. Div. Div. 426

Decision against restraint of trade not applicable to copyright monopolies, 50

1900 XJ. S. act. Hawaii and Porto Rico protection

1900 Bennett v. Boston U. S. C. C. App. J. Colt, 101 F. R. 445

Traveler Co.

Suit must be brought under general copyright of newspaper, when portion is not specifically copyrighted, 272 1900 Dielman v. White U. S. C. C. J. Lowell, 102 F. R. 892

Contract with U. S. Govt, failed to reserve copyright on de- signs, 234