Page:Copyright, Its History And Its Law (1912).djvu/703

This page needs to be proofread.

TABLE OF LAWS AND CASES 671

1906 Hartford Printing U. S. C. C. J. Piatt, 146 F. R. 332;

Co. V. Hartford Directory Co. 148 F. R. 470

Gloss receipts less cost awarded as damages, for wholesale copy- ing, 27s 1906 Macmillan v. Dent Ct. App. J. Vaughan, [1907] i Ch. 107

Charles Lamb letters — copyright separate from material object, 92

1906 Rex II. Willets Com. Serj. Times Ja. 20, '06

Criminal sentences in conspiracy of cheap music pirates, 277

1906 Ward,Lock&Co. B. Chancery J. Kekewich, L. R. [1906] a Ch.

Long SSo

Agreement to write a book assignable after completion of book, 441

1906 White-Smith v. V. S. C. C. App. Per curiam, 147 F. R. 226

Apollo Perforated roll not copy in fact of staff notation, 204

1906 Wooster v. Crane U. S. C. C. J. Van Devanter, 147 F. R. 515

App. Author restrained from selling modification of copyright work previously assigned, 442

1907 Patents and designs act 7 Edw. VII. c. 29 1907 American Tobacco U. S. Sup. Ct. J. Day, 207 U. S. 284

Co. V. Werckmeister

Exhibition with restriction as to copying, not publication, 232, 235 1907 Brackens. Rosen- U. S. C. C. J. Kohlsaat, 151 F. R. 136

thai

Photograph infringes copyright in statuary, 243 1907 Dutton V. Cupples N. Y. App.Div. J. Scott, Pub. Week. 71: 630

& Leon

Imitation of style of series imfair competition, 263 1907 Jude's"Lieder- Ct. App. C. J. Alverstone, L. R. [1907]

tafel" case i Ch. 651

Assignment expunged from record, 447 1907 Philip V. Pennell Chancery J. Kekewich, L. R. [1907] 2

Ch. S77

Publication permitted of biographical information from receiv- ers of letters, 92

1907 Merriam v. Ogilvie U. S. C. C. J. Colt, 149 F. R. 858

Use of name "Webster" not restrainable except where public is misled, 261

1908 Merriam v. Ogilvie U. S. C. C. App. J. Aldrich, 159 F- R- 638

Affirming Merriam v. Ogilvie 1908 White-Smith v. U. S. Sup. Ct. J. Day, 209 U. S. i

Apollo Records not copies or publications of copyright music, 54, 204. Affirming White-Smith v. ApoUo