Page:Debates in the Several State Conventions, v4.djvu/267

This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
NORTH CAROLINA.
251
John Blair, Charles Ward, Wm. Wootten, James Roddy,
Joseph Tipton, Wm. Randal, John Branch, Samuel Cain,
Wm. Bethell, Frederick Harget, Henry Hill, B. Covington,
Abraham Phillips, Richard M'Kinnie, Andrew Bass, J. M'Dowall, Jun.,
John May, John Cains, Joseph Boon, Durham Hall,
Charles Galloway, Jacob Leonard, Wm. Farmer, Jas. Bloodworth,
James Boswell, Thomas Carson, John Bryan, Joel Lane,
John M'Allister, Richard Singleton, Edward Williams, James Hinton,
David Looney, James Whitside, Francis Oliver, Thomas Devane,
John Sharpe, Caleb Phifer, Matthew Brooks, James Brandon,
Joseph Gaitier, Zachias Wilson, Griffith Rutherford, Wm. Dickson,
John A. Campbell, Joseph Douglass, Geo. H. Barringer, Burwell Mooring,
John P. Williams, Thomas Dougan, Timo. Bloodworth, Matthew Locke,
Wm. Marshall, James Kenan, Everet Pearce, Stokely Donelson,
Charles Robertson, John Jones, Asahel Rawlins, 184.
James Gillespie, Egbert Haywood, James Wilson,
Saturday, August 2, 1788.

The Convention met according to adjournment.

The report of the committee of the whole Convention, according to order, was taken up and read in the same words as on yesterday; when it was moved by Mr. PERSON, and seconded by Mr. MACON, that the Convention do concur therewith, which was objected to by Mr. A. MACLAINE.

The question being put, "Will the Convention concur with the report of the committee of the whole convention, or not?" it was carried in the affirmative; whereupon Mr. DAVIE moved for the yeas and nays, and was seconded by Mr. CABARRUS. They were accordingly taken; and those who voted yesterday against the amendment, voted for concurring with the report of the committee: those who voted in favor of the amendment, now voted against a concurrence with the report.

On motion of Mr. WILLIE JONES, and seconded by Mr. JAMES GALLOWAY, the following resolution was adopted by a large majority, viz.:—

"Whereas this Convention has thought proper neither to ratify nor reject the Constitution proposed for the government of the United States, and as Congress will proceed to act under the said Constitution, ten states having ratified the same, and probably lay an impost on goods imported into the said ratifying states,—

"Resolved, That it be recommended to the legislature of this state, that whenever Congress shall pass a law for collecting an impost in the states aforesaid, this state enact a law for collecting a similar impost on goods imported into this state, and appropriate the money arising therefrom to the use of Congress."

On the motion made by Mr. WILLIE JONES, and seconded by Mr. JAMES GALLOWAY,—