Page:Essay on Crimes and Punishments (1775).djvu/220

This page needs to be proofread.

sible for God to change; that God could never have given a law, and inscribed it with his own hand, with an intention that it should be abolished.” He spoke against Christianity, and afterwards retracted all he had said, and even wrote his confession of faith, to escape punishment; but the unhappy persuasion of his heart would not permit him to sign it. The council of the city assembled the clergy, to consult what was to be done with the unfortunate Anthony. The minority of these clergy were of opinion, that they should have compassion on him, and rather endeavour to cure his disease than punish him. The majority determined that he should be burnt, and he was burnt. This transaction is of the year 1632[1]. A hundred years of reason and virtue are scarce sufficient to expiate such a deed.

  1. Spon, p. 500. Guy Vances.