Page:Ferrier's Works Volume 1 - Institutes of Metaphysic (1875 ed.).djvu/19

This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
CONTENTS.
xv
Observations and Explanations, 325
1. A peculiarity in the counter-proposition, 325
2. Fifteenth Counter -proposition, 326
3. The counter-proposition involves a contradiction, 326
PROPOSITION XVI.
The Substantial in Cognition, 328
Demonstration, 328
Observations and Explanations, 329
1. This proposition proves nothing as to existing substance, 329
2. Neither does it declare the nature of known substance, 329
3. Reasons for introducing this proposition, 330
4. The position of natural thinking in regard to this proposition, 331
5. Sixteenth Counter-proposition, 332
6. Its downfall, 333
7. Defence of definition of known substance, 333
8. This definition is due to Spinoza, 334
PROPOSITION XVII.
What the Substantial in Cognition is, 335
Demonstration, 335
Observations and Explanations, 336
1. Seventeenth Counter-proposition, 336
2. Conglomerate character of the counter-proposition, 337
3. Elimination of its ontological surplusage, 337
4. Its contradictory character exposed in so far as it is psychological, 339
5. The counter-proposition considered in so far as it is the product of natural thinking, 340
6. The exact point in the counter-proposition which natural thinking opposes to the proposition, 341
7. Contradiction in the counter-proposition, in so far as it is the product of natural thinking, 341
8. Psychological opinion as to existing substance, 342
9. First, It does not answer its purpose, 342
10. Secondly, It places before us the mere phenomenal, 343
11. The institutional conception of known substance, 344
12. History of distinction between substance and phenomenon—its terms have been reversed, 345
13. Errors caused by this reversal, 346
14. Substance and phenomenon originally bore the signification assigned to them here, 347
15. The known phenomenal according to the older systems, 348
16. The known substantial according to the older systems, 348
17. A word upon existing substance and phenomenon, 349
18. Two main ambiguities in the old systems, 350
19. These ambiguities accounted for, 351
20. And cleared up by a reference to the Institutional doctrine, 352
21. Coincidence of the old speculations with the Institutes, 353
22. An objection obviated, 354