Page:History of Manchester (1771), Volume 1, by John Whitaker.djvu/92

Chap. III. OF MANCHESTER. 6$ the Attrebates, and places the Regni to the Couth of the Cantru — * Ptolemy. See Rcgnum in Iter 1 5 of Richard and 7 of Ante* nmus. — 7 Ptolemy. The whole country of the Bibroces and of the Regni is given to the latter by Ptolemy and to the for- mer by Richard, both confidering them as one people after the conqueft of the other, and Richard more accurately naming them by the appellation of the Conquering tribe. — 8 Richard p. 20 and 24. Quae intermiifione Uxellae amnis Heduorum regionr protenditur, and, Thamefis per fines Heduorum — in oceanum — - influit. — * Ifchalis and Aquae Calidae — So alfo Ptolemy places the Durotriges, not fouth-weft, as he is generally tranflated, but to the fbuth and weft, of the Belgse, airo krpuv %eu fu<np,£p*x{, the Durotriges being to the fouth of the Belgae of Somerfet- fhire and to the weft of the Belgae of Hampshire. — IO UxeUa urbs is given to the Damnonii by Richard. — This Uxella is given to the Hedui by the map, in exprefs contradiction to the account-— " Richard's map. — Ix Cenia urbs and Cenius fluvius given to the Damnonii by Richard. — u UxeUa urbs, Hi- chard. — I4 Ptolemy and Richard p. 20. Damnonhim Promon- torium. The Damnonii are Juf/wx&7*7" or the mod wefterly tribe. — If P. 21 and 22. In this province Richard's map is faulty, carrying the Ordovices into Radnorfhire and giving them Magna. Dr. Stukeley has correfted the miftake, but has made others. He has at once inferted and mifplaced theHeririMohtes,he has placed the Dimetae to the fbuth of the river Stu&ia when he ought to have carried them beyond it to the Dovy, he has en* tirely omitted the Dovy, and he has negle&ed the dotted line* that limit the three kingdoms. — " Civitas Silurum-Magna— Richard p. 21. — ,7 0. I. ch. v. f. 3. — " Richard p. 155 24, 25, and 26, In this province Richard's map has committed two or three miftakes, giving Forum Dianae to the Coitamii (or Cori- tanni) which belonged to the Cafiii, and giving them alio Ben- nonae whkh belonged to the Carnabii,, and Durnomagus which belonged to the Cenomanni. And Dr. Stukeley* s is fo confu fpd, for want of the defining lines of the original, that it would be idle to criticize upon it. — f9 Richard p. 25/ — ao Richard Iter 4. ft Richard p. 25. and Iter 3. Ptolemy, who places the Cantii